Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 839 So. 2d 1.

673 citing documents.

State v. Elmore 80 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Williams 81 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Suggs 81 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Hernandez-Zuniga 81 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Barnes 92 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Alvarez 78 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Adams 78 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Brown 80 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Garner 78 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Anderson 78 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Pouncy 78 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Lara 78 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
State v. Williams 76 So. 3d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Young 73 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Watson 73 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Nickles, supra.
State v. Caldwell 74 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Dorthey, supra
State v. Esque 73 So. 3d 1021 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Moton 73 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Elzier 72 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Const. Art. 1, § 20; State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Robinson, 40,983 (La.App.2d Cir.(1/24/07), ; State v. Bradford, 29,519 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
State v. Atkins 74 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Nickles, supra .
State v. Washington 73 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Atkins 74 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
1/14/03), ; State v. Nickles, supra.
State v. Washington 73 So. 3d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
State v. Johnson 70 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Marshall 70 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. McDaniel, supra.
State v. Wallace 71 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Watson 71 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Smith 71 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Randall 69 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Every, this Court recognized the well-settled standard for reviewing a claim of an excessive sentence: In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following standards for reviewing a claim of excessive sentence: Although a sentence is within statutory limits, it can be reviewed for constitutional excessiveness.
State v. Richardson 71 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Shoupe 71 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Thurman 71 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. McDaniel, supra.
State v. Ingram 71 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Rockett 71 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Barnett 70 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Lister 69 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Lathan 70 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Lewis 69 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Mudd 69 So. 3d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Dorthey, supra
State v. Drayton 63 So. 3d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; and State v. Livingston, 39,390 (La.App.2d Cir.4/6/05), .
State v. Williamson 62 So. 3d 869 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Boswell 62 So. 3d 874 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03), ; (La.
State v. Nickles 60 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. McDan *733 iel, supra.
State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentencing: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
State v. Bennett 63 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Morgan 63 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Hanks 58 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)