Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 839 So. 2d 1.

673 citing documents.

State v. Key 58 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
State v. Henderson 58 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Key 58 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.l/14/0S), ; (La.
State v. Turner 57 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Hyman 62 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Wright 61 So. 3d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Lewis 61 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Welch 57 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Mason 59 So. 3d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. *429 11/10/09), (citing State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), ).
State v. Edwards 56 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State of Louisiana v. Douglas C. Sneed La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
1/14/03), a sentencing range of thirty-five to fifty years is considered acceptable by the supreme court for first-time offenders convicted of armed robbery.
State v. Monroe 53 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to ••• excessive ••• punishment.” Although a sentence is within statutory limits, it can be reviewed for constitutional e
State of Louisiana v. Leland S. Singletary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that sentences of 35 to 50 years have been found to be acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery, and State v. Thomas, 98-1144, p. 2 (La.10/9/98), 719 So
State v. Davis 57 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Dillard 55 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Horn 55 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Smith, 2001-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the *230 Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of excessive sentence: Louisiana Constitution of 1974, art. I, § 20 provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o law shall subject any person to ...
State v. Armstrong 47 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Foster 47 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Blow 46 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See State v. Smith, *751 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Haltom 46 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Morris 46 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Wise 42 So. 3d 1137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Jenkins 45 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574, pp. 6-7 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. White 44 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. SIGERS 42 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Givens 42 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; (La.
State v. Robinson 42 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Sims 41 So. 3d 1277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Givens 42 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Givens 41 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Lewis 43 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03); .
State v. Reed 37 So. 3d 1116 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Castro 40 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Knight 36 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Lewis 36 So. 3d 1190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Vance 36 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State of Louisiana v. Moses Buchanan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Eason 36 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Logan 34 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Johnson 34 So. 3d 1124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 2001-2574 (La.1/14/03), ; State v. Dorthey, 92-3120 (La.9/10/93), .
State v. Jackson 34 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Aguilar 39 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Jones 35 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), .
State v. Every 35 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following standards for reviewing a claim of excessive sentence: Although a sentence is within statutory limits, it can be reviewed for constitutional excessiveness.
State v. CASSIMERE 34 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Indeed, in State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 7 (La.1/14/03), , the Court noted that the defendant’s forty-year sentence was “within the thirty-five to fifty-year range this Court has found acceptable for first offenders convicted of armed robbery.
State v. Wilson 32 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See State v. Smith, 01-2574 (La.01/14/03)
State v. Dyas 32 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Little 30 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010