Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ducre, 827 So. 2d 1120.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tracey T. Wright La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
The Kullman Firm, a Professional Law Corporation v. Integrated Electronic Technologies, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Jayson Lee Figueroa La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
9/ 13/ 02), ( per curiam).
State of Louisiana v. William G Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. D'Mycal Lmontay Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Charles R. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
9/13/02), (per curiam)).
Terry Gotch v. Scooby's Asap Towing, LLC La. 2019
State v. Richardson 241 So. 3d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
9/13/02), , 1120-21 ( per curiam ) (finding no reversible error where, after testimony by a police officer that the defendant possessed a "distribution amount" of cocaine, the jury was admonished that it, not the witness, remained the ultimate finder of fact).
State v. Johnson 226 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Caminita 203 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Lamizana 184 So. 3d 9 La. 2016
“Mistrial is a drastic remedy which should be declared only upon a clear showing of prejudice by the defendant; a mere possibility of prejudice is not sufficient.” State v. Ducre, 2001-2778 (La.9/13/02), .
State v. Gross 145 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Instate v. Ducre, 01-2778 (La.9/13/02), (per curiam).
State v. Johnson 52 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Ducre, 01-2778 (La.9/13/02), (per curiam).
State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
9/13/02), the supreme court held: When a witness makes an irrelevant remark which might prejudice the defendant, La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
In State v. Ducre, 01-2778, p. 1 (La.9/13/02), , the supreme court held: When a witness makes an irrelevant remark which might prejudice the defendant, La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Smith 868 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See State v. Ducre, 2001-2778, p. 2 (La.9/13/02), (per curiam).
State v. Morgan 842 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Addressing a strikingly similar issue, the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Ducre, 2001-2778 (La.9/13/02), , recently reinstated the defendant’s conviction, finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in opting to admonish the jury rather than grant a mistrial when a police officer indicated in his testimony that the cocaine the defendant possessed was a “distribution amount.” In so doing, the Court distinguished