Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sugasti, 820 So. 2d 518.

189 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Adam Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Comeaux 239 So. 3d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State Ex Rel. John Esteen v. State of Louisiana 239 So. 3d 233 La. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Kelvin Latrial McAdory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. McAdory 237 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Luckett 236 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Jackson 244 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    6/21/02), ; State v. Modisette , 50,846 (La.
  • State v. Robertson 243 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    06/21/02), , citing State v. Wright, supra ; State v. Modisette , 50,846 (La.
  • State v. Jackson 243 So. 3d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    6/21/02), ; State v. Calhoun , supra .
  • State v. Maize 223 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Henry 220 So. 3d 706 La. 2017
    6/21/02), (J, dissenting).
  • State v. Calhoun 222 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Plater 222 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Logue 216 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    6/21/02), ; State v. Modi-sette, 50,846 (La.App.
  • State v. Ross 207 So. 3d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    6/21/02), ("This court has consistently held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.”) (citation omitted); see also State v. Mead, 14-1051, p. 4 (La.App.
  • State v. Baptiste 209 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Earl Sanders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Sanders 209 So. 3d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Sean Holloway 217 So. 3d 343 La. 2016
    6/21/02), State v. Wright, 384 So.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marvin Dixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Modisette 207 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has consistently held that "the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.” State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), -22 .
  • State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has consistently held that "the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.” State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), -22 .
  • State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
  • State ex rel. Nicholas v. State 192 So. 3d 729 La. 2016
    See State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Gibson 192 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    And, in order to determine, the statutorily-provided sentencing limits, we examine “the law in effect on the date of the commission of the offense of which the prisoner was convicted.” See Mead, 14-1051, p. 4, 165 So.3d at 1047 (emphasis in original), (citing State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Parker, 03-0924, pp. 9-10 (La.4/14/04), (defendant’s status as a habitual offender is determined as of the date that he commits the charged crime)).
  • State v. Thompson 189 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    In State v. Sugasti, 2001-3407 (La.6/21/02), -21 , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: This court has consistently held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.
  • State v. Johnson 188 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    State v. LeBlanc, 2014-0163 (La.1/9/15), ; State v. Sugasti, 2001-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Warrick 186 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02); .
  • State v. Gonzalez 173 So. 3d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02); .
  • State v. Sanderson 174 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. LeBlanc, 2014-0163 (La.1/9/15), ; State v. Sugasti, 2001-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Mitchell 169 So. 3d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.06/21/02), .
  • State v. Dock 167 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Sugasti, 2001-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Wilson 171 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Donny R. Morgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    6/21/02), the supreme court stated: This court has consistently held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.
  • State v. Morgan 164 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), , the supreme court stated: This court has consistently held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.
  • State v. Wilt 170 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02); ( -131 (La.1983), respectively).
  • State v. Mead 165 So. 3d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Parker, 03-0924, pp. 9-10 (La.4/14/04), (defendant’s status as a habitual offender is determined as of the date that he commits the charged crime).
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Jones 165 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ("A defendant must be sentenced according to sentencing provisions in effect at the time of the commission of the offense.”); State v. Parker, 03-0924, p. 9 (La.4/14/04), (defendant’s status as an habitual offender is determined as of the date he commits the underlying offense).
  • State v. McClure 169 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02); -22 .
  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    6/21/02), the supreme court held, in pertinent part: This court has consistently held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.
  • State v. Thacker 157 So. 3d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    In State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), , the supreme court held, in pertinent part: This court has consistently held that the law in.
  • State v. McClure 165 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • Paul Massey v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections 149 So. 3d 780 La. 2014
    State v. Hyde, 07-1314, p. 1 (La.11/21/07), ; | State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Gros, 205 La.
  • State v. Griffin 136 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Common 132 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02); .
  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    6/21/02), the court held in pertinent part: This court has consistently held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.
  • State v. Videau 131 So. 3d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Richey 128 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .