DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sugasti, 820 So. 2d 518.

189 citing documents.

  • State v. Alfaro 128 So. 3d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Aston 125 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02); .
  • State v. Greenup 123 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Dickerson 159 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    As the supreme court explained in State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), : This court has consistently held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.
  • State v. Surry 121 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    As the supreme court explained in State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), : This court has consistently held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.
  • State v. Hunter 121 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Martin 121 So. 3d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Buhcannon 119 So. 3d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Sugasti, 2001-3407, pp. 4-5 (La.6/21/02), (law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer).
  • State v. Domangue 119 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 4/28/09) , , 1094 n. 9, writ denied, 09-1394 (La.2/26/10), (citing State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), ).
  • State v. Barnett 118 So. 3d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Cobbs 119 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    For purposes of economy'and to avoid confusion, the current statute is noted even though “the penalty provision in effect at the time of the offense is the applicable provision.” State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), -21 .
  • State v. Alexander 119 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Napoleon 119 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Wallace 110 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Chairs 106 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Dussett 106 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Sam 105 So. 3d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Terry 108 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Morrison, 45,620 (La.App.2d Cir.11/24/10), .
  • State v. Alexander 111 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Sugasti, 2001-3407 (La.6/21/02), -22 .
  • State v. Richoux 101 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Cammatte 101 So. 3d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Leday 97 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Williams 77 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Johnson, 08-1156 (La.App.
  • State v. DELVALLE 73 So. 3d 1026 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    See State v. Sugasti, 2001-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Scoggins 70 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Dick, 2006-2223 (La.1/26/07), , citing State v. Sugasti, 2001-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Hoskins 66 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02); ; State v. Bellow, 08-259, p. 20 (La.App.
  • State v. Morrison 55 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Eason 36 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Sugasti, 2001-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Jones 39 So. 3d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    For purposes of economy and to avoid confusion, we will refer to the current statute in our discussion even though we are aware "that the penalty provision in effect at the time of the offense is the applicable provision.” State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), -521 .
  • State v. Jones 39 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    For purposes of economy and to avoid confusion, we will refer to the current statute in our discussion even though we are aware “that the penalty provision in effect at the time of the offense is the applicable provision.” State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), -521 .
  • State v. Oliver 30 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Bellow, 08-259, p. 20 (La.App.
  • State v. Grimes 16 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Further, in State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), , the Louisiana Supreme |9Court reiterated that it has consistently been held that the law in effect at the time of the commission of the offense is determinative of the penalty which the convicted accused must suffer.
  • State v. Johnson 9 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Sampognaro 9 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Also, in State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, pp. 1-2 (La.6/21/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed this Court’s decision vacating the defendant’s sentence and remanding for resentencing where defendant received probation for an offense that did not allow for probation at the time the defendant committed the offense.
  • State v. Evans 998 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    In State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), , the Louisiana Supreme Court examined whether 2001 La.
  • State v. Bellow 993 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 2 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. E.P.C., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. E.P.C. 980 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    *225 laWe find that the defendant should have been “sentenced according to sentencing provisions in effect at the time of the commission of the offense.” State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Birch 979 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Sugasti, XXXX-XXXX (La.06/21/02), .
  • State v. Hyde 968 So. 2d 726 La. 2007
    See, e.g., State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02)
  • State v. White 968 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Sugasti, XXXX-XXXX
  • State v. Dick 951 So. 2d 124 La. 2007
    Acts No. 403 was enacted by the legislature and signed by the governor, this court had occasion to address the issue of whether the ameliorative changes applied solely to crimes committed after the effective date of the act, in State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Thomas 951 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Dillon 947 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Mourra 940 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    The State responds that there is no ex post facto violation in this case, citing State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), , and State v. Girod, 04-854 (La.App.
  • State v. Dick 943 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    State v. Sugasti, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Robert 931 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 3 (La.6/21/02), .
  • In Re Elloie 921 So. 2d 882 La. 2006
    See State v. Parker, XXXX-XXXX p. 9-10 (La.4/14/04), ; State v. Sugasti, XXXX-XXXX p. 4 (La.6/21/02), ; -131 (La.
  • State v. Williams 905 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407, p. 4 (La.6/21/02)
  • State v. Guillard 902 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    State v. Sugasti, 01-3407 (La.6/21/02), .