Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Carmouche, 872 So. 2d 1020.

76 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Keith Joseph Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
5/14/02), “The ‘prejudicial conduct’ may include remarks of veniremen during voir dire.” However, “a mistrial is a drastic remedy, and except in instances in which the mistrial is mandatory, is warranted only when a trial court error results in substantial prejudice to the defendant, depriving him of a reasonab
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Augustine La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Cordale Richard La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
5/ 14/ 02), O' Brien, 168 So.
State Of Louisiana v. Dejuan Otta Kelly, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Casey Michael Hatch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Bunnak Landon La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
5/14/02), on reh'g (Sept.
State of Louisiana Versus Saleh Omar La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Dexta Zayshawn Hall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. William A. McDonough La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Isaiah Doyle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
5/14/02), on reh’g (Sept.
State of Louisiana v. Bruce L. Lachney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Joey Rogers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Sherman Hampton La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
5/14/02), a prospective juror made a remark regarding a sanity test taken by the defendant.
State of Louisiana v. Emile Richard -Aka- Emile Joseph Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Carmouche, 2001-0405 (La.5/14/02), State v. Sanders, 93-0001 La.11/30/94)
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana Versus Hursen A. Patin La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
5/14/02), State v. Pullen, 19-4 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Nicholas Pullen La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Timothy Lee Elliott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
5/ 14/ 02), - 42, as follows: A criminal defendant has a constitutional right not to be tried while legally incompetent.
State v. Robinson 275 So. 3d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Roderick Jermaine Cawthorne, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
hat the trial court’s decision regarding a defendant’s competency to stand trial “should not turn solely upon whether he suffers from a mental disease or defect, but must be made with specific reference to the nature of the charge, the complexity of the case, and the gravity of the decision with which the defendant is faced.” State v. Carmouche, 01–0405 (La.5/14/02)
State v. Cawthorne 257 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Jack -Aka- Anthony Kwonskiee Jack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5/14/02), the defendant argues that the trial court erred in not ordering a new trial or dismissing the jury panel when Ms. Bellard was excused.
State v. Jack 244 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/14/02), , the defendant argues that the trial court erred in not ordering a new trial or dismissing the jury panel when Ms. Bellard was excused.
State v. Patterson 241 So. 3d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hutchinson 190 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Car-mouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Johnson, 03-620 (La.
State v. Dotson 187 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Carmouche, 2001-0405, p. 8 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Kirk, 2011-1218, p. 10-11 (La.App..
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Carmouche, 2001-0405, p. 8 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Kirk, 2011-1218, p. 10-11 (La.App.
State v. Jones 182 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 8 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Kirk, 11-1218, pp. 10-11 (La.App.
State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 30 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Gaspard 169 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2572, 2579 , 120 L.Ed.2d 353 (1992), State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. O'Brien 168 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Carmouche, 2001-0405 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Magee 143 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Carmouche, 2001-0405 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Flemings 118 So. 3d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Crossley 117 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Carmouche, 2001-0405 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Edwards, 44,552 (La.App.2d Cir.8/19/09), .
State v. Pollard 106 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Carmouche, 01-405 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
This court has affirmed capital sentences in the following cases: State v. Wright, 01-0322 (La.12/4/02), (defendant killed his girlfriend’s 6-year-old daughter with multiple blunt force trauma); State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), (defendant killed his two daughters, ages 15 and 2, and their mother, with shotgun), reh’g granted, 02-1407 (La.9/25/03), (case remanded to consider issue of mental retardation in light of Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 , 122 S.Ct.
State v. Kirk 98 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Carmouche, 01-045, p. 8 (La.5/14/02), .
State of Louisiana v. Harold Dewayne Baylor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
ng Bennett, supra, explained that the trial court’s decision regarding a defendant’s competency to stand trial “should not turn solely upon whether he suffers from a mental disease or defect, but must be made with specific reference to the nature of the charge, the complexity of the case, and the gravity of the decision with which the defendant is faced.” State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02)
State of Louisiana v. Gregory Dwayne Harrell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
“A criminal defendant has a constitutional right not to be tried while legally incompetent.” State v. Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 29 (La.05/14/02)
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
ng Bennett, supra, explained that the trial court’s decision regarding a defendant’s competency to stand trial “should not turn solely upon whether he suffers from a mental disease or defect, but must be made with specific reference to the nature of the charge, the complexity of the case, and the gravity of the decision with which the defendant is faced.” State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.5/14/02), .
State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.05/14/02), .
State of Louisiana v. James Lyndal Foster La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/14/02), and State v. Wessinger, 98-1234, p. 24 (La.
State v. Foster 59 So. 3d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
682 , 166 L.Ed.2d 531 (2006) (quoting State v. Carmouche, 01-405, p. 20 (La.5/14/02), ,1035 and State v. Wessinger, 98-1234, p. 24 (La.5/28/99), , cert.
State v. Johnson 60 So. 3d 653 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
State v. Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 29 (La.05/14/02), .
State of Louisiana v. James E. Ramsdell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
5/14/02), (citations omitted), the supreme court stated: The “prejudicial conduct” may include remarks of veniremen during voir dire.
State v. Ramsdell 47 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 775(6), a mistrial may be ordered when “[f]alse statements of a juror on voir dire prevent a fair trial.” In State v. Carmouche, 01-405, p. 20 (La.5/14/02), (citations omitted), the supreme court stated: The “prejudicial conduct” may include remarks of veniremen during voir dire.
State v. Jackson 34 So. 3d 1121 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Carmouche, 01-0405 (La.05/14/02), ; cert.
State v. Robinson 39 So. 3d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“A criminal defendant has a constitutional right not to be tried while legally incompetent.” State v. Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 29 (La.05/14/02), .
State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
See State v. Carmouche, 01-0405, p. 17 (La.5/14/02), (A trial judge is accorded broad discretion in ruling on the fitness of jurors to serve on the panel because “the judge has the benefit of seeing the facial expressions and hearing the vocal intonations of the members of the jury venire as they respond to questioning by the attorneys....