Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 826 So. 2d 616.

23 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Christopher D. Rodgers La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 8/21/02), writ denied, 02-2549 (La.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of K.B. Vs. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 8/21/02), ).
State of Louisiana v. Tremaine Williams La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Brianna Carrie v. Willie Jones La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 8/21/02), see also La C.E.
Mikie C. Launey v. Spencer D. Launey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
4 Cir. 8/21/02), writ denied, 02-2549 (La.
Yavonka G. Archaga Versus Tonya Johnson, Garron Johnson and Johnson and Johnson Law Offices, LLC La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 8/21/02), writ denied, 02-2549 (La.
State v. Harris 266 So. 3d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 8/21/02), , writ denied , 2002-2549 (La.
State v. Haydin 235 So. 3d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 8/21/02), , writ denied, 02-2549 (La.
State v. Smith 192 So. 3d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 8/21/02), (“[I]t is a fundamental law of evidence that an article or substance which is introduced as demonstrative evidence, or to which a witness is asked to testify, must be sufficiently identified as the one involved in the occurrence in question.” (quoting State v. Hotoph, 99-243 (La.App.
State v. Jackson 191 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Everett 96 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Denson 83 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Martin 72 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Scoggins 70 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Peters 60 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lewis 61 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 8/21/02) , , writ denied, 02-2549 (La.9/5/03), .
State v. Chism 3 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 8/21/02), , writ denied, 02-2549 (La.9/5/03), (cited, with approval in State v. Taylor, 04-346 (La.App.
State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Rideau 947 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 8/21/02) , , this Court affirmed the conviction of the defendant who was convicted of aggravated battery even *143 though the victim did not testify at the trial.
State v. Taylor 887 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 8/21/02) , , writ denied, 02-2549 (La.9/5/03), .
State v. Taylor 850 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Jones 846 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 8/21/02) , , this Court, citing the Wolfe case, again found that a waiver must be established by a contemporaneous record.
State v. Phillips 834 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002