Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pham, 839 So. 2d 214.

39 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Keyhaid J. McGee La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Bunnak Landon, AKA Hannah Landon, AKA Bunnak Lim La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Floyd Falkins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 1/22/03), ).
State of Louisiana v. Montreal Davis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana in the Interest of K.K. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 1/22/03), ).
State of Louisiana v. Thomas Riles La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 1/22/03), U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102, 1106 2 Officer DeSalvo testified he had eleven years of experience dealing with concealed weapons, and had been involved in over one hundred cases involving concealed weapons.
State of Louisiana v. Louis Polkey La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 1/22/03), U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 (5 Cir.1993).
State of Louisiana v. Colin Gilmartin La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 1/22/03), (citing U.S. v. Green, 111 F.3d 515 (7 Cir. 1997); U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 (5 Cir. 1993)).
State v. Handy 226 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State ex rel. R.M. 209 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Myles 186 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Caston 170 So. 3d 152 La. 2015
State v. Hall 160 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 1/22/03), (citation omitted)).
State v. McClendon 133 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Candebat 133 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Pham, 2001-2199 (La.App.1/22/03), .
State v. Vessel 131 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Howard 120 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Fields 120 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Chaplain 114 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/22/03), ; U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102, 1106 (5 Cir.1993).
State v. Bentley 116 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/22/03), ; U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102, 1106 (5 Cir.1993).
State of Louisiana v. Kenrard D. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/22/03), the defendant, a first-time offender, was convicted of possession of more than 200 grams but less than 400 grams of cocaine.
State v. Guillot 115 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/22/03), ; U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102, 1106 (5 Cir.1993).
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/22/03), ; U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 (5 Cir.1993).
State ex rel. T.H. 106 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bridges 104 So. 3d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 1/22/03), ; U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 (5 Cir.1993).
State v. Matthews 100 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Harris 98 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lampton 95 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lewis 85 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bell 70 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Harveston 71 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Williams 62 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 1/22/03), (citing U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 (5 Cir.1993), cert.
State v. Francis 60 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Taylor 50 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Wells 45 So. 3d 577 La. 2010
4 Cir. 1/22/03), -220 , the court stated: “For an arrest, the law does not require that ‘reasonable cause to believe’ be established by evidence sufficient to convict; the arresting officer need not be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of the arrested person’s guilt.
State v. Bernard 31 So. 3d 1025 La. 2010
State v. Anderson 949 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Pham, 2001-2199 (La.App.1/22/03), .
State v. Hawkins 923 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 1/22/03) , , as follows: It is not a prerequisite for the existence of probable cause to make an arrest that the police officers know at the *765 time of the arrest that the particular crime has definitely been committed; it is sufficient that it is reasonably probable that the crime has been committed under the totality of the
State v. Dowell 857 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
4 Cir. 1/22/03) , , as follows: It is not a prerequisite for the existence of probable cause to make an arrest that the police officers know at the time of the arrest that the particular crime has definitely been committed; it is sufficient that it is reasonably probable that the crime has been committed under the totality of the known

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by