DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vigne, 820 So. 2d 533.

47 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Larry St. Amant, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    The State therefore bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that “the information ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered by lawful means....” Id.; State v. Vigne, 01–2940 (La.6/21/02)
  • State of Louisiana Versus Larry St. Amant, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
    The State therefore bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that “the information ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered by lawful means....” Id.; State v. Vigne, 01–2940 (La.6/21/02)
  • State of Louisiana v. Tori Lynette Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    .” Id.; State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02)
  • State of Louisiana v. Montreal Davis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
  • State of Louisiana v. Kelly Folse La. 2019
    6/21/02), (citing Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444, 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Robertson 219 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Ables 213 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State v. Nelson 215 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RAY DELOACH AKA RAY A. DELOACH La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), quoting, Tague v. Louisiana, 444 U.S. 469, 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Woodberry 171 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), (citation omitted).
  • State v. Williams 144 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has further noted that “it is well-settled that a ‘heavy burden rests on the government to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination and his right to retained or appointed counsel.’ ” State v. Vigne, 01-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), (quoting Tagne v. Louisiana, 444 U.S. 469, 470 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Cope 137 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Walker 128 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Vigne, 2001-2940 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Lewis 126 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    As noted in State v. Vigne, 2001-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), , in order for a statement made by a suspect in custody to be admissible at trial, police officers must advise the suspect of his Fifth Amendment rights prior to interrogating him.
  • State v. Coleman 121 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Wilson 119 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    As noted in State v. Vigne, 01-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), , in order for a statement made by a suspect in custody to be admissible at |strial, police officers must advise the suspect of his Fifth Amendment rights prior to interrogating him.
  • State v. Gilmore 156 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    As noted in State v. Vigne, 01-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), , in order for a statement made by a suspect in custody to be admissible at trial, police officers must advise the suspect of his Fifth Amendment rights prior to interrogating him.
  • State v. Harris 98 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    om a card, but was unable to testify specifically which rights were read to the defendant, and he could not recite the Miranda warnings from memory, the Louisiana Supreme Court characterized such *916 evidence the State introduced to demonstrate that the detective adequately advised defendant of all of his rights required by Miranda “equivocal at best.” State v. Vigne, 01-2940, p. 8 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. White 74 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Vigne, 2001-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State *582 v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Thomas 8 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    ” Id,.; State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Chism 3 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), (Citation omitted).
  • State v. Morton 993 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    See also, State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Fournette 989 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    1244 , 63 L.Ed.2d 537 (1980); State v. Lee, 2005-2098 (La.1/16/08), ; State v. Vigne, 2001-2940 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
    Id.; State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), , quoting, Tague v. Louisiana, 444 U.S. 469 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), quoting, Tague v. Louisiana, 444 U.S. 469, 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Hemphill 942 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    The court also believed that the officers' actions of handcuffing the defendant and then subsequently seeking verbal consent to search did not comply with the requirements of State v. Vigne, 2001-2940 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Chauvin 945 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    "The inevitable discovery doctrine `is in reality an extrapolation from the independent source doctrine: Since the tainted evidence would be admissible if, in fact, it was discovered through an independent source, it should be admissible if it inevitably would have been discovered.'" State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), , quoting Murray v. U.S., 487 U.S. 533, 539 , 108 S.Ct.
  • State v. Carter 939 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    See State v. Vigne, 2001-2940 (La.06/21/02), .
  • State v. Pitre 924 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), , quoting, Tague v. Louisiana, 444 U.S. 469 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Craig Pitre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), quoting, Tague v. Louisiana, 444 U.S. 469, 100 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrel G. Ledee A/K/A Shane Allen Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Ledee 900 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    ” State v. Vinge, 01-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Vigne, 2001-2940, p. 6 (La.6/12/02), .
  • State v. James 897 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    In State v. Vigne, 2001-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), , the Court set forth the standard for determining whether a confession was voluntarily made: A trial judge's ruling on whether or not a statement is voluntary is given great weight and will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the evidence.
  • State v. Williams 893 So. 2d 7 La. 2004
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02)
  • State v. Genter 872 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    In State v. Vigne, 2001-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), , the court set forth the standard for determining whether a statement was voluntarily made: A trial judge's ruling on whether or not a statement is voluntary is given great weight and will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the evidence.
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Poullard 863 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State of Louisiana v. John R. Chesson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    6/21/02), quoting, Tague v. Louisiana, 444 U.S. 469, 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Chesson 856 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Vigne, 01-2940 (La.6/21/02), , quoting, Tague v. Louisiana, 444 U.S. 469 , 100 S.Ct.
  • State v. Barton 857 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Accord, State v. Vigne, 01-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Jenkins 857 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    Accord, State v. Vigne, 01-2940, p. 6 (La.6/21/02), .
  • State v. Hosner 854 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See State v. Vigne, 2001-2940 (La.6/21/02), ; State v. Jones, 2002-1171 (La.App.
  • State v. Raiford 846 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    This standard and the analysis to be used in the review of all confessions was restated by the court in State v. Vigne, p. 6, 2001-2940 (La.6/21/02), , 537: A trial judge's ruling on whether or not a statement is voluntary is given great weight and will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly unsupported by the evidence.