Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 828 So. 2d 546.

63 citing documents.

Kathryn Steele and Steele Strategies, Inc. Versus Michael D. Kotler, Pelican State Industrial Medicine, Inc., McM Medclinic Management, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02)
April Markiewicz, wife of/and Mark Markiewicz v. Sun Construction, LLC, Penn Mill Lakes, LLC, and Cooper Engineering, Inc, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
10/15/02), Jones v. Americas Insurance Company, 2016-0904 (La.
Herman Lee Hooper v. Louisiana Pigment Company, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Krystyn Landry Versus National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, Ceva Logistics U.S., Inc. and Jeremiah Ethan Rodney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
10/15/02), Darby v. Sentry Ins.
Agrifund, LLC v. Radar Ridge Planting Co., Inc. and Thomas A. Dickerson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
10/15/02), Jeff Mercer, LLC v. State through Dept. of Transp.
Stephenson v. Bryce W. Hotard Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. 271 So. 3d 190 La. 2019
Kerry Simmons v. Cornerstone Investments, LLC La. 2019
Green v. Garcia-Victor 248 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Ron Warren, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Derek Hebert v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Company La. 2017
Jones v. Americas Insurance Co. 226 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Curole v. Delcambre 224 So. 3d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/15/02), ], the Supreme Court discussed the issue of pleading conspiracy, stating that the court of appeal began by noting that when a civil conspiracy is alleged and proven, the injured party may recover against all participants in solido, and not merely against those who physically committed the injury.
Jeff Mercer, LLC v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 222 So. 3d 1017 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
10/15/02), ; Thames v. Thames, 50,639 (La.
Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. IP Petroleum Co. 219 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Thames v. Thames 196 So. 3d 653 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
3d Cir.10/5/11), , quoting Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Dileo v. Horn 189 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Steven Gillespie v. Calcasieu Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
10/15/02), (emphasis added).
Gillespie v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 179 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Addressing La.Civ.Code art. 2324’s imposition of solidary liability against co-conspirators “for the damage caused by such act[,]” the supreme court has ‘explained that it is “compensatory damages that recompense a plaintiff for injury caused by a defendant’s act.” Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299, p. 9 (La.10/15/02), (emphasis added).
Haygood v. Dies 174 So. 3d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
3d Cir.10/5/11), , 867 quoting Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Dwayne Chauvin v. Exxon Mobil Corporation 158 So. 3d 761 La. 2014
Prime Insurance Co. v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 151 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 9/17/08), (citing Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), ).
Oleszkowicz v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 129 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-299 (La.10/15/02); .
Huddleston v. Huddleston 106 So. 3d 567 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Citing Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 2002-0299 (La.10/15/02), , Cook and Fe-well argued that because Darlene is seeking only punitive damages against them, they cannot be held liable in solido with the other defendants.
Ames v. Ohle 97 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 9/17/08), (citing Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), ).
James Bowlin v. Russell Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
William H. Nungesser v. Michael B. Moreno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 2002-0299 (La.10/15/02)
Arc Industries, L.L.C. v. Nungesser 74 So. 3d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 2002-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Bonnie Romero v. Clarendon America Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Romero v. CLARENDON AMERICA INS. CO. 54 So. 3d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-299, p. 14 (La.10/15/02), .
Crutcher-Tufts Resources, Inc. v. Tufts 38 So. 3d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 2002-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Crawley v. Coastal Bridge Co. Inc. 24 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Bourgeois v. Meyer 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Rebecca Owens v. Joshua G. Byerly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Owens v. Byerly 23 So. 3d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Crutcher-Tufts Resources, Inc. v. Tufts 992 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), citing Butz v. Lynch, 97-2166 (La.App.
Schulingkamp v. Carter 984 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Patrick v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 957 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), .
Darby v. SENTRY INS. AUTO. MUT. CO. 960 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
The trial court cited Ross v. Conoco, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), , as support for its conclusion.
Darby v. Sentry Insurance Automobile Mutual Co. 960 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
The trial court cited Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 2002-0299 (La.10/15/02), , as support for its conclusion.
Carrie Badon v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Badon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 934 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-299 *931 (La.10/15/02), .
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 922 So. 2d 1113 La. 2006
art. 2315.3, as interpreted by this Court in Ross v. Conoco, 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 921 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
11/26/03), ; Bourgeois, 841 So.2d at 910 ; Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Barnhill v. Remington Oil and Gas Corp. 918 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), .
Shiers v. Richland Parish School Bd. 902 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Carol Dejean v. St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Dejean v. St. Charles Gaming Co. 903 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
OPINION Scope of Review and Applicable Law “Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is ^appropriate.” Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-299, p. 5 (La.10/15/02), .
Thomas v. North 40 Land Development, Inc. 894 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 7-8 (La.10/15/02), (citing Butz v. Lynch, 97-2166, p. 6 (La.App.
Hood v. Sartor 882 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Boudreaux v. Jeff 884 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Ross v. Conoco, Inc., 02-0299 (La.10/15/02), .
Davis v. Counts 880 So. 2d 968 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
See, Ross v. Conoco, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.10/15/02), .