Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite St. Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 831 So. 2d 955.

24 citing documents.

Johnny Cousain v. Smitty&39;s Supply, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
12/ 4/ 02), the employee, who had been receiving workers' compensation benefits for several years, submitted falsified mileage reports to request reimbursement for travel to receive medical care for the purpose of obtaining more mileage reimbursement than he was entitled to receive.
Neil Laugand v. Four Points by Sheraton La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
12/4/02), (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court found that forfeiture of benefits under the anti-fraud provisions applies to all benefits, including medical and indemnity benefits); see also Ard v. Orleans Material & Equip., 98-0312, p. 3 (La.
Paul Medley v. Bennett Timber Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
12/4/02), (emphasis added): As this court found in Resweber, [], LSA–R.S.
Debra White v. Wis International La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
12/4/02), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that any fraudulent statement in violation of La.R.S.
Leontine Moran Versus Rouse's Enterprises, LLC and Great American Alliance Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
12/4/02), and its holding that upon a determination of fraud on the part of a workers’ compensation claimant, all benefits are terminated, whether related to the fraudulent conduct or not.
Margaret C. Camalo v. Patricia Laura Estrada Courtois La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
12/4/02), (Weimer, J., concurring).
Hayes v. Louisiana State Penitentiary 970 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-0632 (La.12/4/02), .
Porter v. Pellerin Construction Co. 958 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-632 (La.12/4/02), .
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. John C. Guilbeau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Guilbeau 934 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-0632 (La.12/4/02), .
SLIDELL MEMORIAL HOSP. v. Mull 916 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-0632, p. 8 (La.12/4/02), .
Costales v. Turner Industries 905 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-632 (La.12/4/02), ; Heckel Logging, Inc. v. Pruitt, 33,314 (La.App.
Griffin v. Farm Fresh Food Supplier 907 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Harrison v. Overnite Transportation 906 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-0632, p. 7 (La.12/4/02), .
Williams v. Duplessis Cadillac 906 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-0632, p. 8-9 (La.12/04/02), ; Issa v. LL & G Const., Inc., 02-1215, p. 7-8 (La.
Lee v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 890 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 2002-0632 (La.12/4/02), , the court held that upon a determination of fraud on the part of a workers’ compensation claimant, all benefits are terminated, whether related to the fraudulent conduct or not.
Tyler v. Nifty Fifties Cafe' 886 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 2002-0632 (La.12/4/02), ), adequately explain the decision.
Leonard v. James Indus. Constructors 879 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis , XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), .
Teilla L. Noel v. Home Health Care 2000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
12/4/02), in support of its argument.
Noel v. Home Health Care 2000, Inc. 867 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-632 (La.12/4/02), , in support of its argument.
Apeck Construction, Inc. v. Foster M. Bowers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Apeck Const., Inc. v. Bowers 862 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-0632 (La.12/4/02), .
Guidry v. Brewer 857 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis, 02-0632, p. 9 (La.12/4/702), .
Darby v. Gilbert Richard, Inc. 838 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
2002); , Justice Calogero noted the disproportionate severity of the penalties required under the current interpretation of Section 1208 in light of the relatively minor nature of possible infractions.