Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Burguieres v. Pollingue, 843 So. 2d 1049.

217 citing documents.

Frank Darby, Jr. v. Daniel Vallere La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation; and (5) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit arose out of the transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the first litigation.” Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02–1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03)
Crown Pine Timber 4, Lp v. Crosby Land & Resources, L.L.C. F/K/A Crosby Chemicals, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Walter J. Horrell v. Jack Marks Alltmont La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
2/ 25/ 03), Bovie v. St.
Rain Cii Carbon, LLC v. Turner Industries Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Susan Russo Marchand v. Texas Brine Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
City of Carencro v. Acadiana Water and Sewer, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2/25/03), further explained: A reading of La.
James Arness Thomas v. Marsala Beverage Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Roy Anderson Corporation v. 225 Baronne Complex, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
131 Beverly Knoll, LLC v. Clipper Constr., LLC 273 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
02/25/03), , 1052-1053 ; See also, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State , 07-2469 (La.
Priority Nurse Staffing, Inc. v. Tanshi, LLC 265 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
02/25/03), ; Alpine Meadows, L.C.
Duncan v. Duncan 262 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Hernandez v. ASAP Emp't Serv., Inc. 266 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Singleton v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n 258 So. 3d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/25/03), , 1053, the Supreme Court, in considering La.
City of Shreveport v. Shreveport Mun. Fire & Police Civil Serv. Bd. 256 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Wicker v. La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 257 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Hoddinott v. Hoddinott 253 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/25/03), , 1053 (citing La.
Joyce Angel Cazelot v. Wilfred A. Cazelot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Armbruster v. Anderson 250 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Palermo v. Century Indem. Co. 248 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Robert Frank Palermo v. Century Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Barrie v. City of New Orleans 248 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Davisson v. Davisson 248 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Barnett v. La. Med. Mut. Ins. Co. 248 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Palir v. Guideone Ins. Co. 243 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/25/03), , 1054, the supreme court reviewed the jurisprudential underpinnings of the legal theory of res judicata and concluded that the "identity of parties" requirement mandates that the "parties must appear in the same capacities in both suits."
John Palir, III v. Guideone Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
2/25/03), the supreme court reviewed the jurisprudential underpinnings of the legal theory of res judicata and concluded that the “identity of parties” requirement mandates that the “parties must appear in the same capacities in both suits.” The parties to the suits here undoubtedly are not appearing in the same capa
Simone B. Guillory v. Samuel S. Broussard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
2/25/03), established that the following five elements must be satisfied for a finding that a second action is precluded by res judicata: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the tim
Guillory v. Broussard 242 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/25/03), , 1053, established that the following five elements must be satisfied for a finding that a second action is precluded by res judicata: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment
Quatrevingt v. State 242 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Helen Moore v. MacQuarie Infrastructure Real Assets La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Moore v. Macquarie Infrastructure Real Assets 258 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jerry Suire and Antonia G. Suire, Etc. v. Oleum Operating Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
2/25/03), has established that the following five elements must be satisfied for a finding that a second action is precluded by res judicata: “(1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final
Suire v. Oleum Operating Co. 235 So. 3d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2/25/03), , has established that the following five elements must be satisfied for a finding that a second action is precluded by res judicata: “(1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final jud
Schiff v. Pollard 222 So. 3d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Board 219 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Jones v. Jones 220 So. 3d 855 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. IP Petroleum Co. 219 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Newman, Hoffoss & Devall, LLP v. Raleigh Newman, Aplc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Newman Hoffoss & Devall, LLP v. Raleigh Newman, APLC 216 So. 3d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Bryan Reed v. Cowboy's Western Store and Trailer Sales, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Reed v. Cowboy's Western Store & Trailer Sales, Inc. 214 So. 3d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
George Raymond Williams, M.D. v. Sif Consultants of Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2/25/03), stated: A reading of La.
Williams v. SIF Consultants of Louisiana, Inc. 209 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2/25/03), , stated: A reading of La.
Patricia Lynn Dillane v. Anthony Kenneth Dillane La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Quoting Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), the supreme court reiterated the five elements that must be established in order for a judgment to have a res judicata effect on a second action: (1) the judgment is valid (2) the judgment is final (3) the parties are the same (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existe
In re Medical Review Panel Claim of Scott 206 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Collins v. Ward 204 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
City of Bastrop v. Harris 198 So. 3d 163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
In Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), , 1053 the Louisiana Supreme Court established the five prerequisites for a finding of res judicata under the provisions of La.
Cantu v. Schlumberger 197 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
v. State, 07-2469 (La.9/8/08), , citing, Burguieres v. Pottingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), ; Von Drake v. Rogers, 45,305 (La.App.2d Cir.5/19/10), , writ denied, 10-1471 (La.10/15/10), .
Belinda Layssard Stokes v. Doris Barnhart Layssard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Stokes v. Layssard 187 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Importantly, “[f]or res judicata to apply, the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit must have existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation.” Burgui-eres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 12 (La.2/25/03), .
Slaughter v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University & Agricultural & Mechanical College 197 So. 3d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .