DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Burguieres v. Pollingue, 843 So. 2d 1049.

217 citing documents.

  • BBCL Enterprises, LLC v. American Alternative Ins. Corp. 187 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    “The civilian concept of res judicata is based upon a presumption of correctness.” Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), ; 1053.
  • Contogouris v. Ocean Therapy Solutions, LLC 187 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    In Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), -53 , the Louisiana Supreme Court set out five prerequisites for a finding of res judicata under La.
  • Steven O. Richard v. Fred Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, pp. 6-8 (La.2/25/03), -53; see also Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State, 07-2469, pp. 10-11 (La.9/8/08)
  • Richard v. Taylor 179 So. 3d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, pp. 6-8 (La.2/25/03), -53 ; see also Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State, 07-2469, pp. 10-11 (La.9/8/08), .
  • Entrada Co. v. Pressley 183 So. 3d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Cowan v. Kanuch 176 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    (quoting Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), ).
  • Penton v. Castellano 169 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), ; Alpine Meadows, L.C.
  • Toliver v. Entergy Services, Inc. 169 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Marable v. Empire Truck Sales of Louisiana, LLC 165 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • First Bank & Trust v. Simmons 165 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2015
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Darver, L.L.C. v. Burch 163 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Richard G. David v. Dione W. David La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Quoting Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02–1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), the supreme court reiterated the five elements that must be established in order for a judgment to have a res judicata effect on a second action: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action
  • David v. David 156 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Quoting Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), , the supreme court reiterated the five elements that must be established in order for a judgment to have a res judicata effect on a second action: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time
  • Meadows v. Winkler 154 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Dwayne Chauvin v. Exxon Mobil Corporation 158 So. 3d 761 La. 2014
    2/25/03), -53; see also Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. State, 07-2469, pp. 10-11 (La.
  • Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Dixie Brewing Co. 154 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Furie Petroleum Co. v. SWEPI, LP 152 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Eddy Oliver, Oscarlene Nixon, and Mildred Goodwin v. Orleans Parish School Board 156 So. 3d 596 La. 2014
    02-1385 (La.2/25/03), 1053 .
  • Cox v. O'Brien 147 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Pepper v. Pepper 146 So. 3d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Susan Arnaud, Et Ux. v. Ronald Dies La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Quoting Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), the supreme court reiterated the five elements that must be established in order for a judgment to have a res judicata effect on a second action: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action
  • Arnaud v. Dies 153 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Quoting Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), , the supreme court reiterated the five elements that must be established in order for a judgment to have a res judicata effect on a second action: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time
  • Pointe Coupee Parish School Board v. Louisiana School Employee's Retirement System 140 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Oliver v. Orleans Parish School Board 133 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), ; La.
  • Oleszkowicz v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 129 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
    See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03); .
  • Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Paul J. Cox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Cox 128 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), ().
  • Matherne v. TWH Holding, L.L.C. 136 So. 3d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Dixie Brewing Co. 131 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Davis v. J.R. Logging, Inc. 136 So. 3d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Succession of Frank Bernat La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    2/25/03), the 3 supreme court reiterated the five elements that must be established in order for a judgment to have a res judicata effect on a second action: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the c
  • Succession of Bernat 123 So. 3d 1277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Quoting Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 7 (La.2/25/03), , the ^supreme court reiterated the five elements that must be established in order for a judgment to have a res judicata effect on a second action: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the tim
  • Bovie v. St. John the Baptist Parish, Dept. of Streets & Roads 125 So. 3d 1158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03); .
  • Wagoner v. Chevron USA, Inc. 121 So. 3d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    *733 ]gThe supreme court in Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385 (La.2/25/03), , determined that, based upon the language of the statute, five elements must be satisfied to conclude that a second action is precluded by res judicata: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time
  • Guerrero v. Guerrero 110 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8, rehearing denied, (La.4/25/03).
  • Pamela Manuel v. Larry Rhinehart Bieber La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    2/25/03), the supreme court identified five requisite elements for a matter to be considered res judicata: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the fir
  • Gabriel v. Lafourche Parish Water District 112 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    2 See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Grantt Guillory Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Kajun Seafood v. Floyd Quebedeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Grantt Guillory Enterprises, Inc. v. Quebedeaux 110 So. 3d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Louisiana Revised Statutes 13:4281 provides that, in pertinent part, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided by law, a valid and final judgment is conclusive between the same parties, except on appeal or other direct review.” See also Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Milo Nickel v. Mb Industries, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3d 1253 (citing Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02–1385 (La.2/25/03), and In re Succession of Carlton, 11–288 (La.App.
  • Dean v. Delacroix Corp. 106 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Magbee v. Federal Express 105 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Paul Magbee v. Federal Express La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    See Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03)
  • New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Foundation, Inc. v. Kirksey 104 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • Robert L. Manard III PLC v. Falcon Law Firm PLC 119 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
    Burguieres v. Pollingue, 2002-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), .
  • C. F. Kimball, III, Et Ux. v. Luhr Brothers, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2/25/03), set forth the following five requisite elements for a matter to be considered res judicata: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first lit
  • Viel Olivier v. Olivier Builders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2/25/03), set forth the following five requisite elements for a matter to be considered res judicata: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in t
  • Olivier v. Olivier Builders 103 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Our Louisiana Supreme Court, in Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), , set forth the following five requisite elements for a matter to be considered res judicata: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation; and (5) th
  • Kimball v. Luhr Bros. Inc. 101 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Our Louisiana Supreme Court, in Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), , set forth the following five requisite elements for a matter to be considered res judicata: (1) the judgment is valid; (2) the judgment is final; (3) the parties are the same; (4) the cause or causes of action asserted in the second suit existed at the time of final judgment in the first litigation; and (5) th
  • Slimp v. Sartisky 100 So. 3d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In Burguieres v. Pollingue, 02-1385, p. 8 (La.2/25/03), , the Court set forth five criteria that must be met for a matter to be considered res judicata.