Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of JM, 837 So. 2d 1247.

109 citing documents.

State in the Interest of Jna, Rmd and Mpd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
at 1403; State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.M., J.P.M., and M.M., 02-2089, p. 7 (La.1/28/03)
State ex rel. M.C. 194 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03), , 1252.
State in the Interest of J.M.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
1/28/03), La.Ch.Code art. 1035(A).
State of Louisiana in the Interest of A. R. and A. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03)
State ex rel. A.R. 178 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03), , 1262.
State in the Interest of C. E., K. E., & C.E. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State ex rel. C.E. 176 So. 3d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/08), .
State ex rel. MTS 161 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
J.M., 2002-2089 (La.1/28/03), ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. P.B. 154 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), ; State ex rel.
State in the Interest of A. G. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03)
State ex rel. A.G.B. 153 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03), , 1252.
State ex rel. E.I.R. 130 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State in the Interest of S. v. & C. V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
J.M., 02–2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03)
State ex rel. T.M.P. 126 So. 3d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
J.M., 02-2089, pp. 9-10 (La.1/28/03), (noting that "[t]he finding of best interest of the child is entitled to great deference and is subject to review for manifest error.”)).
State ex rel. T.J. 124 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State in the Interest of M.A.N., N.A.N. & E.J.N. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03)
State ex rel. M.A.N. 106 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03), , 1252.
State in the Interest of E.M.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State ex rel. E.M.M. 96 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
and M.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), ).
State ex rel. A.M. 90 So. 3d 1029 La. 2012
J.M., 02-2089, p. 9 (La.1/28/03), (“[fjorcing children to remain in foster care indefinitely, when there is no hope of reuniting them with their families, runs afoul of the state and federal mandates to further the best interests of the child”).
State in the Interest of J. K. G. & J. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State ex rel. J.K.G. 118 So. 3d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03), , 1252.
State ex rel. S.C.D. 80 So. 3d 3 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State in the Interest of J.M., 02-2089, p. 16 (La.1/28/03), , 1257.
State ex rel. H.A.B. 49 So. 3d 345 La. 2010
at 1403 ; State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.M., and M.M., 02-2089, p. 7 (La.1/28/03), , 1252.
State in the Interest of H. A. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State ex rel. H.A.B. 35 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State ex rel J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State Ex Rel. Hab 35 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State ex rel J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State, in the Interest of Dt 17 So. 3d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
J.M., 2002-2089, p. 11 (La.1/28/03), , 1254.
In Re Tms 999 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In the Interest of Tms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In the Interest of TMS 999 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State in the Interest of J.M., J.P.M., and M.M., 02-2089, pp. 8-9 (La.1/28/03), , 1252-53.
State, in Interest of Cr 996 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State Ex Rel. Scm 986 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
J.M., 2002-2089 (La.1/28/03), ; State in the Interest of S.M.W., XXXX-XXXX (La.2/21/01), .
State in the Interest of D.H.L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1/28/03), La.Ch.Code art. 1035(A).7 “Further, even upon finding that the State has met its evidentiary burden, a court still should not terminate parental rights unless it determines that to do so is in the child’s best interests.” State ex.
State ex rel. D.H.L. 981 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), ; La.Ch.Code art. 1035(A).
State Ex Rel. Ddm 983 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03), , 1252.
State ex rel. D.D.M. 983 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03), , 1252.
In Re: C.L.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1/28/03), La.Ch.Code art. 1035(A).6 “Further, even upon finding that the State has met its evidentiary burden, a court still should not terminate parental rights unless it determines that to do so is in the child’s best interests.” State ex.
State ex rel. C.L.B. 972 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), ; La.Ch.Code art. 1035(A).
In Re State Ex Rel. Clb 972 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), ; La.Ch.Code art. 1035(A).
State of Louisiana v. in the Interest of J.C., J.C., J.R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1/28/03), (citations omitted).
State ex rel T.P.M. 947 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court considered a termination of parental rights case in which the mother worked very hard at complying with her case plan, but due to her “intellectual handicap” or “subaverage intelligence,” she continued to have [ 3difficulty maintaining basic standards for her children.
State in the Interest of M.M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1/28/03), -53 (footnote omitted).
State ex rel. M. M. 939 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
J. M., 02-2089, pp. 7-10 (La.1/28/03), , 1251-53 (footnote omitted).
State Ex Rel. At 936 So. 2d 79 La. 2006
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State ex rel. A.T. 936 So. 2d 79 La. 2006
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State Ex Rel. CEC v. DMDB 912 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
J.M., 2002-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State ex rel. C.E.C. v. D.M.D.B. 912 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
J.M., 2002-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State ex rel. M.H. v. K.W.H. 912 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
and M.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State Ex Rel. MH v. KWH 912 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
and M.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), .