Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of JM, 837 So. 2d 1247.

109 citing documents.

State ex rel. W.M.O. 905 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State in the Interest of J.M., 02-2089, p. 16 (La.1/28/03), , 1257.
State ex rel. D.D. 898 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
J.M., 02-2089, p. 8 (La.1/28/03), , 1252.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of F.A. and A.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
1/28/03), -52 (footnote omitted), our supreme court discussed in detail the law applicable to termination of parental rights stating the following: In Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753, 102 S.Ct.
State ex rel. F.A. 889 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
J.M., 02-2089, p. 7 (La.1/28/08), , 1251-52 (footnote omitted), our supreme court discussed in detail the law applicable to termination of parental rights stating the following: In Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 , 102 S.Ct.
Bryant v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 881 So. 2d 1214 La. 2004
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), ; Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.3/16/01), (on rehearing); Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, 98-1981 (La.4/13/99), .
Bryant v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'N 881 So. 2d 1214 La. 2004
J.M., 02-2089 (La.1/28/03), ; Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp., 00-0947 (La.3/16/01), (on rehearing); Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, 98-1981 (La.4/13/99), .
State ex rel. L.R.S. 877 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
and M.M., 2002-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State ex rel. M.A.S. 873 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State in the Interest of J.M., J.P.M., and M.M., 2002-2089 (La.1/28/03), .
State 874 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State in Interest of JM, 2002-2089 (La.1/28/03), .