DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thompson, 842 So. 2d 330.

240 citing documents.

  • State v. Reeves 162 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/11), .
  • State v. Hooter 162 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.App.
  • State v. Flores 167 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    “The trial judge has wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within statutory limits, and the sentence imposed should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion.” State v. Thompson, 02 -333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Monroe 152 So. 3d 1011 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. O’Neal, 44,067 (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 147 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Miles, supra.
  • State v. Sullivan 146 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.
  • State v. Austin 146 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03)
  • State v. Weber 139 So. 3d 519 La. 2014
    |fiIn the present case, reasonable grounds existed to order the blood draw from defendant because it is objectively reasonable to assume, even to a fair probability that might support a finding of probable cause, State v. Thompson, 02 -0333, p. 8 (La.4/9/03), , the owner of a vehicle is also the driver.
  • State v. Brooks 139 So. 3d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/14/11), .
  • State v. Percy 137 So. 3d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Stephens, 46,304 (La.App.2d Cir.6/22/11), , citing State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; and State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/05), .
  • State v. Kohlman 136 So. 3d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/14/11), .
  • State v. Miles 136 So. 3d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Blanche, supra.
  • State v. Osborne 130 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Duncan, 47,697 (La.App.2d Cir.1/16/13), , writ denied, 13-0324 (La.9/13/13), .
  • State v. Holmes 130 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.App.
  • State v. Evans 130 So. 3d 965 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/11), .
  • State v. York 121 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Lockett 120 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    permits police to search the vehicle without more.”); see also State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), (if a vehicle is readily mobile, there is no difference between seizing the car while obtaining a search warrant and immediately searching the vehicle without a warrant).
  • State v. Allen 118 So. 3d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    1710 , 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009); State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.04/09/03), .
  • State v. Caliste 131 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    permits police to search the vehicle without more.”); see also State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), (if a vehicle is readily mobile, there is no difference between seizing the car while obtaining a search warrant and immediately searching the vehicle without a warrant).
  • State v. George 117 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/11), .
  • State v. Reyes 114 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/28/05), .
  • State v. Brown 157 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In State v. Thompson, 02 -0333, p. 10 (La.4/9/03), , the defendant was originally convicted of two counts of simple possession of heroin.
  • State v. Henderson 110 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Jones, 46,712 (La.App.
  • State v. Reed 107 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    It is axiomatic that “if a vehicle is readily mobile, there is no difference between seizing the car while obtaining a search warrant and immediately searching the vehicle without a warrant.” Waters, supra (citing State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ).
  • State v. Terry 108 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Glover 106 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/11), .
  • State v. Palmer 105 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Meyers 100 So. 3d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    (La.1978); See State v. Thompson, 02-0333 p. 10 (La.4/9/03), -38 .
  • State v. Tatum 103 So. 3d 550 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Diaz, 46,750 (La.App.2d Cir.12/14/11), .
  • State v. Jiles 104 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Barrett 104 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.
  • State v. Burney 92 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Lee, supra.
  • State v. Bell 92 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Blanche 92 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Chinn 94 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Thompson, 02-0333 p. 10 (La.4/9/03), -38 (quotation omitted)
  • State v. Brock 91 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Thompson, 02 -0338 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Lee 79 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Lawrence, 45,061 (La.App.2d Cir.3/3/10), , writ denied, 10-0615 (La.10/8/10), .
  • State v. Williams 81 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/26/05), .
  • State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.
  • State v. Fatheree 77 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.
  • State v. Lara 78 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/05), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jerry L. Lefeat La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03)
  • State v. Marshall 70 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Smith 71 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Stephens 71 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/05), .
  • State v. Hoskins 66 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    State v. Thompson, 02 -333, p. 10 (La.4/9/03); .
  • State v. Heard 70 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/05), .
  • State v. Hunter 62 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/05), .
  • State v. Turner 57 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Willis 56 So. 3d 362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.