DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thompson, 842 So. 2d 330.

240 citing documents.

  • State v. Malone 56 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    App.2d Cir.10/28/05), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State ex rel. S.O. 49 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In State v. Thompson, 02 -0333, pp. 5-6 (La.4/9/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court defined the standard for determining whether an officer has *4 reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop: Reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop is something less than probable cause and must be determined under the specific facts of each case by whether the offic
  • State v. Bass 47 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/05), ; State v. O’Neal, 44,067 (La.App.2d Cir.4/8/09), , writ denied, 2009-1243 (La.2/12/10), .
  • State v. Givens 41 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Knight 36 So. 3d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Vance 36 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Eason 36 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Gipson 34 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.2d Cir.10/28/05), ; State v. O’Neal, 44,067 (La.App.2d Cir.4/8/09), , writ denied, 2009-1243 (La.2/12/10), .
  • State v. Wilson 32 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.01/26/05), .
  • State v. Lawrence 32 So. 3d 329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; (La.
  • State v. Little 30 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.
  • State v. Turner 32 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    *290 State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Burns 32 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. *276 Williams, 2008-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Stutts 26 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.
  • State v. Holden 30 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/26/05), .
  • State v. Autry 30 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Smith 28 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4/9/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the standard for determining whether an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop: 14Reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop is something less than probable cause and must be determined under the specific facts of each case by whether the offi
  • State of Louisiana v. Malcolm James Simon AKA Malcolm Simon AKA Malcolm J. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03)
  • State v. Linnear 26 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.
  • State v. Linnear 26 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Marshall 26 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Stowe 25 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/28/05), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Roy J. Chapman, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Ashley 22 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Boudreaux 21 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Robinson 22 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/26/05), .
  • State v. Robinson 22 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Standfill 15 So. 3d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. William, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 *1258 (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.01/26/05), .
  • State v. Triggs 16 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Darryl Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03)
  • State v. Boudreaux 11 So. 3d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03)
  • State v. Johnson 9 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Anderson 6 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 6 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.01/26/05), .
  • State v. McCALMAN 7 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. ┴4Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, *851 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. O'NEAL 7 So. 3d 182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.
  • State v. Cooper 2 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Ledford, 40,318 (La.App.
  • State v. Bass 4 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.01/26/05), .
  • State v. Lazard 2 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    In State v. Thompson, 02-0333, pp. 5-6 (La.4/9/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the standard for determining whether an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop: Reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop is something less than probable cause and must be determined under the specific facts of each case by whether the office
  • State v. Johnson 999 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/26/05), .
  • State v. Smith 999 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 997 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Bobby D. Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Thompson, 02-0333 (La.4/9/03)
  • State v. Young 997 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 454-455 , 91 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brown 996 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams , XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Caston 996 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.
  • State v. Littleton 996 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/26/05), .
  • State v. Wells 991 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 5-6 (La.4/9/03), , the Court set forth the standard for determining whether an officer can lawfully detain a defendant: Reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop is something less than probable cause and must be determined under the specific facts of each case by whether the officer had sufficient knowledge of particular fac
  • State v. Howard 987 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Conway 992 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    2041, 2043 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Thompson, 2002-0333, p. 6 (La.4/9/03), .