Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Helou, 857 So. 2d 1024.

44 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Yery Gabriel Ramirez-Delgado La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
10/23/03), citing Jackson, supra.
State of Louisiana Versus Edwar Lopez AKA "Mantequilla" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
10/23/03), citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Alex Francisco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
10/23/03), where the court held that a punch in the nose, without more, was insufficient to prove extreme physical pain.
State of Louisiana v. Jorge Lopez Benavides La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
10/23/03), the Supreme Court reversed an appellate court finding that the evidence was sufficient to prove the serious bodily injury element of second degree battery.
State of Louisiana v. Freddy Lee Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Pike 273 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
10/23/03), , 1030 (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court found the evidence against the defendant insufficient to prove "serious physical injury" as contemplated under the second degree battery statute but entered a conviction for simple battery, which it found to be a responsive verdict to second degree battery); Compare also Sta
State v. Baugh 262 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/23/03), , 1030 (Weimer, J., dissenting): Jurors are chosen from different walks of life for the purpose of bringing to their deliberations a variety of different life experiences.
State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/23/03), , and to a lesser degree on State v. Broussard , 09-1012 (La.
State v. Haydin 235 So. 3d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/23/03), , to support his argument that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction for second degree battery.
State v. Jones 182 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03), , the defendant punched the victim in the nose with his fist causing him to bleed profusely, saturating his shoes, the front, of his jeans and his shirt with blood, and leaving puddles of blood on the ground.
State v. Miner 163 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Mr. Miner relies on State v. Helou, 02-2302, p. 6 (La.10/23/03), , where the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that “the presence of blood alone does not satisfy the ‘serious bodily injury’ element of second degree battery.” After surveying cases involving the issue of what constitutes “serious bodily injury,” the Helou Court found that “a punch in the nose, without more evidence
State v. Porter 151 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Helou, 02-2302, p. 5 (La.10/23/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Brent Debarge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
In State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03), the court stated the presence of blood alone does not constitute serious bodily injury and noted that it “cannot infer that the loss of blood is tantamount to „extreme physical pain.‟ ” The court further noted that it “cannot infer that a punch in the nose, without more evidence, is suff
State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03)
State ex rel. T.H. 140 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03), .
State v. German 133 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The trial court explained that it was excluding this responsive verdict because “the facts alleged does *207 not show that the victim in this case had any kind of serious injury and loss of consciousness that would justify a charge for second degree battery.” In State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reviewed the sufficiency of the evidence and support for defendant’s conviction for second degree battery.
State of Louisiana v. Dennis Weldon Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Thompson 123 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03), .
State v. Dussett 126 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
It is not the function of an appellate court to assess credibility or reweigh the evidence.” Id., (citing State v. Helou, 2002-2302, p. 5 (La.10/23/03), ).
State v. Edgar 140 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Helou, 2002-2302, p. 5 (La.10/23/03)
State v. Taylor 123 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Helou, 2002-2302, p. 5 (La.10/23/03), .
State v. Buhcannon 112 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
*320 Mr. Buhcannon relies upon State v. Helou, 02-2302, p. 9 (La.10/23/03), , wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the evidence presented by the State was “insufficient to sustain the defendant’s conviction for second degree battery.” In Helou , the defendant was charged with second degree battery after the defendant struck the victim’s nose with his fist, and the defendant’s
State of Louisiana v. Christopher K. Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
10/23/03), the supreme court found that the defendant‟s act of striking the victim in the nose with his fist constituted the use of force or violence upon the victim.
State v. Mayeux 128 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Helou, 02-2302, p. 9 (La.10/23/03), , the supreme court found that the defendant’s act of striking the victim in the nose with his fist constituted the use of force or violence upon the victim.
State v. Ferdinand 107 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Helou, 2002-2302, p. 5 (La.10/23/03), .
State v. Winston 100 So. 3d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Helou, 2002-2802, p. 5 (La.10/23/03)
State in the Interest of C.P. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State ex rel. C.P. 91 So. 3d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See also State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03), .
State v. SWANZY 61 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Helou, 2002-2302, p. 5 (La.10/23/03)
State v. Brown 56 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Helou, 2002-2302, p. 5 (La.10/23/03), -1028 ; State v. Hernandez, 96-0115, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Paul Jacoby Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Broussard 33 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Helou, 02-2302, pp. 4-5 (La.10/23/03), -28 .
State v. Minor 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
10/23/03), , the victim had a bloody nose, in State v. Vidaurri, 05-742 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Regal Minor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
10/23/03), the victim had a bloody nose, in State v. Vidaurri, 05-742 (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Jn 984 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Helou, 02-2302, p. 5 (La.10/23/03)
State ex rel. J.N. 984 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Helou, 02-2302, p. 5 (La.10/23/03)
State v. Clay 942 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
02-2302 (La.10/23/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Juan R. Vidaurri La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/23/03), -29, the supreme court gave the following examples of cases where the state had proven the serious bodily injury element of second degree battery: Our jurisprudence demonstrates many cases where the State proved the “serious bodily injury” element of second degree battery.
State v. Vidaurri 919 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In State v. Helou, 02-2302, pp. 6-8 (La.10/23/03), -29 , the supreme court gave the following examples of cases where the state had proven the serious bodily injury element of second degree battery: Our jurisprudence demonstrates many cases where the State proved the "serious bodily injury" element of second degree battery.
State v. Bernard 899 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Helou, 2002-2302 (La.10/23/03), .
State v. Williams 901 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Touchet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/23/03), the court stated the presence of blood alone does not constitute serious bodily injury and noted that it “cannot infer that the loss of blood is tantamount to ‘extreme physical pain.’” The court further noted that it “cannot infer that a punch in the nose, without more evidence, is sufficient to support a c
State v. Touchet 897 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
In State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03), , the court stated the presence of blood alone *908 does not constitute serious bodily injury and noted that it "cannot infer that the loss of blood is tantamount to `extreme physical pain.'" The court further noted that it "cannot infer that a punch in the nose, without more evidence, is sufficient to support a
State v. Odom 878 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Compare State v. Helou, 02-2302 (La.10/23/03), -1029 , and cases cited therein.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by