Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Price, 842 So. 2d 491.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Lawrence Sly La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 4/2/03), writ denied sub nom.
State v. Flores 268 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 4/2/03), , writs denied , 2003-1322 (La.
State v. Sparkman 136 So. 3d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 4/2/03) , , writ denied, 03-1322 (La.11/21/03), and 03-1517 (La.12/12/03), .
State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 4/2/03) , , the defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial, made after the prosecutor referred in his opening statement to the defendant’s having surrendered with a letter from his attorney advising authorities that he had an attorney, that they were not to talk to the defendant or ask him an
State of Louisiana v. Horatio Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Therefore, we find that, as in Price, the testimony of police officers was not crucial to the State’s case.
State v. Harvey 12 So. 3d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 4/02/03), , this court set forth the standard for reviewing a trial court's denial of a motion for new trial based upon a claim of newly-discovered evidence: In order to obtain a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, a defendant must show: (1) the new evidence was discovered after trial; (2) the failure to discover the
State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 4/2/03), writs denied, 03-1322 (La.
State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 4/2/03) , , writs denied, 03-1322 (La.11/21/03), and 03-1517 (La.12/12/03), , where the trial court denied the defendant's challenge for cause regarding a prospective juror whose husband was a state trooper.
State of Louisiana v. Lisa Landry Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Cir. 4/2/03), writs denied, 03-1322 (La.
State v. Johnson 941 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
4 Cir.4/2/03), , writs denied, 03-1322 (La.11/21/03), and 03-1517 (La.12/12/03), , the defendant's challenge for cause regarding prospective juror Saizan was denied.
State v. Haywood 907 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 4/02/03) , -509 , this court set forth the standard for reviewing a trial court's denial of a motion for new trial based upon a claim of newly-discovered evidence: In order to obtain a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, a defendant must show: (1) the new evidence was discovered after trial; (2) the failure to disc
State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 4/2/03), , the defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial, made after the prosecutor referred in his opening statement to the defendant having surrendered with a letter from his attorney advising authorities that he had an attorney, that they were not to talk to the defendant or ask him anyt
State v. Lee 888 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
4th Cir.4/2/03), , units denied, 03-1322 (La.11/21/03), , 03-1517 (La.12/12/03), .
State v. Goldston 868 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 4/02/03) , , this count considered a similar issue and stated: In order to obtain a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, a defendant must show: (1) the new evidence was discovered after trial; (2) the failure to discover the evidence at the time of trial was not due to the defendant’s lack of diligence; (3) the evidence