Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wilturner, 858 So. 2d 743.

23 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 11/5/03), the trial court failed to impose the defendant’s sentence for the conviction of sexual battery without the benefits of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence which was required under La.R.S.
State v. Thomas 63 So. 3d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 11/5/03) , , the trial court failed to impose the defendant’s sentence for the conviction of sexual battery without the benefits of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence which was required under La.R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Malcolm James Simon AKA Malcolm Simon AKA Malcolm J. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Roy J. Chapman, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Brown 997 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Bobby D. Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Chad E. Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Batiste 969 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Galindo 968 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 11/5/03), , the defendant received a five-year sentence for sexual battery of a twelve-year old mentally disabled boy.
State of Louisiana v. Betty Findlay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 11/5/03), a panel of this court provided the following analysis of the law pertaining to excessive sentence claims: The standard of review for Louisiana appellate courts in determining whether a sentence levied upon a 7 particular
State v. Findlay 949 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 11/5/03), , a panel of this court provided the following analysis of the law pertaining to excessive sentence claims: The standard of review for Louisiana appellate courts in determining whether a sentence levied upon a particular defendant was excessive is the manifest-abuse-of-discretion standard.
State of Louisiana v. Charles Ray Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (alteration in original), this court provided the following analysis of the law pertaining to excessive sentence claims: The standard of review for Louisiana appellate courts in determining whether a sentence levied upon a particular defendant was excessive is the manifest-abuse-of-dis
State of Louisiana v. Alan D. Simmons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/5/03), the court explained: The standard of review for Louisiana appellate courts in determining whether a sentence levied upon a particular defendant was excessive is the manifest-abuse-of-discretion standard.
State v. Pitre 924 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/5/03), , this court held: The standard of review for Louisiana appellate courts in determining whether a sentence levied upon a particular defendant was excessive is the manifest-abuse-of-discretion standard.
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Craig Pitre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 11/5/03), this court held: The standard of review for Louisiana appellate courts in determining whether a sentence levied upon a particular defendant was excessive is the manifest-abuse-of-discretion standard.
State of Louisiana v. Ronald Spencer, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (alteration in original).
State v. Spencer 888 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (alteration in original).
State of Louisiana v. Lamar Pierce Phillips La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 11/5/03), 11 (alteration in original).
State v. Phillips 887 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 11/5/03), (alteration in original).
State of Louisiana v. Renaldo Gerard Sweet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Sweet 880 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State of Louisiana v. Delano Sutton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State v. Sutton 879 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004