DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Perkins v. Shaheen, 867 So. 2d 135.

13 citing documents.

  • Brandon S. Wise Indv. and Obo Drey Domone Wise v. George O'Neil and Antoinette O'Neil La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    3 Cir. 3/3/04), and in Guillot
  • Wayne Guillot, Et Ux. v. Reece Guillot, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Mitchell Lemaire v. John Frank Blanchard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 3/3/04), the trial court found the exclusion applicable for not only the claims of intentional tort committed by the minor, but also the allegations of negligent supervision against John Blanchard, Jr. The trial court dismissed Farm Bureau from the suit with prejudice.
  • Wayne Guillot, Et Ux. v. Reece Guillot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • Guillot v. Guillot 92 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • Andrew Richard v. Robert Brasseaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 3/3/04), and Canterberry v. Chamblee, 41,940 (La.App.
  • Richard v. Brasseaux 50 So. 3d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 3/3/04) , ; and Canterberry v. Chamblee, 41,940 (La.App.
  • Reinhardt v. Barger 15 So. 3d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    App. 3 Cir. 3/3/04), , the Third Circuit interpreted language from a Farm Bureau policy similar to the Allstate provision at issue in this case, and in effect concluded that Directive 152 issued by the Commissioner only prohibits exclusions resulting from a child's negligent acts, but does not prohibit an exclusion for a minor's intention
  • Pd v. Swl 993 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3rd Cir.3/3/04), ; Hewitt v. Allstate Insurance Company, 98-0221, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
  • P.D. v. S.W.L. 993 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3rd Cir.3/3/04), ; Hewitt v. Allstate Insurance Company, 98-0221, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
  • Bonin v. Westport Ins. Corp. 930 So. 2d 906 La. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/3/04), (holding that a father's alleged negligent supervision was excluded from the homeowner's and farm liability policies when the damage resulted from an insured's intentional acts); Neuman v. Mauffray, 99-2297 (La.
  • Michael R. Fontenot v. Kipp L. Duplechine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 3/3/04), this court considered exclusionary wording similar, but not identical, to the language under consideration here.
  • Fontenot v. Duplechine 891 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 3/3/04) , , this court considered exclusionary wording similar, but not identical, to the language under consideration here.