Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillot v. Doe, 879 So. 2d 374.

21 citing documents.

Shantel Delco v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Earl Ivory v. Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Giles Hill v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Louise Theresa Doty v. Goauto Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 6/30/04), -84 (footnote omitted).
Doty v. Goauto Ins. Co. 251 So. 3d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 6/30/04), , 383-84 (footnote omitted).
Tyron Reed v. Dondi Lacombe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Reed v. LaCombe 172 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Shawn Bernard v. the Hartford Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 6/30/04), -80 (footnotes omitted), stated, “[a]n appellate court should rarely disturb an award of damages due to the great and, even, vast discretion vested in the trial court.
Bernard v. Hartford Insurance 12 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 6/30/04), -80 (footnotes omitted), stated, “[a]n appellate court should rarely disturb an award of damages due to the great and, even, vast discretion vested in the trial court.
Robert Veroline, Jr. v. Priority One Ems La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
App. 3 Cir. 6/30/04), this court stated: “Bystander damages are available when serious emotional distress arises directly and immediately from the claimant’s observation of a traumatic injury causing event to the direct victim or from the observation of the aftermath of the traumatic injury-causing event soon thereafter.” Guillot , 87
Veroline v. Priority One Ems 6 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 6/30/04), , this court stated: “Bystander damages are available when serious emotional distress arises directly and immediately from the claimant’s observation of a traumatic injury causing event to the direct victim or from the observation of the aftermath of the traumatic injury-causing event soon thereafter.” Guillot, 879 So
MUNAR v. State Farm Ins. Co. 972 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-80 (footnotes omitted; alteration in original), when discussing the correct procedure for reviewing damage awards, stated the following: An appellate court should rarely disturb an award of damages due to the great and, even, vast discretion vested in the trial court.
Maria M. Munar v. State Farm Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-80 (footnotes omitted; alteration in original), when discussing the correct procedure for reviewing damage awards, stated the following: An appellate court should rarely disturb an award of damages due to the great and, even, vast discretion vested in the trial court.
Curtis Randall v. Concordia Nursing Home D/B/A Camelot Leisure Living La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-80, when discussing the correct procedure for reviewing damage awards, stated the following: An appellate court should rarely disturb an award of damages due to the great and, even, vast discretion vested in the trial court.
Randall v. Concordia Nursing Home 965 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-80 , when discussing the correct procedure for reviewing damage awards, stated the following: An appellate court should rarely disturb an award of damages due to the great and, even, vast discretion vested in the trial court.
Paul Darren Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. and Venson R. Aymond La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-80.
Williams v. Aymond 945 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-80 .
Delton Ray Coutee v. Rayland K. Beurlot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-80.
Coutee v. Beurlot 943 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-80 .
Hamilton v. Walker 893 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-380 .
Bonnie Hamilton v. Charles R. Walker and Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 6/30/04), at 379-380.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by