DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cheairs v. State Ex Rel. DOTD, 861 So. 2d 536.

162 citing documents.

  • Lam Ex Rel. Lam v. State Farm Auto. Ins. 901 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that "the only issue directly addressed by Daubert is the reliability of an expert's methodology."
  • Christopher Sims v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Sims v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 897 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    and Dev., 03-680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Abraham v. RICHLAND PARISH HOSP. SERVICE 894 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    and Development, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/3/03), , the court further specified that admission of expert testimony is proper only if all three of the following things are true: (1) the expert is qualified to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address; (2) the methodology by which the expert reaches his conclusions is sufficiently reliable as dete
  • Frank Alaimo v. Racetrack at Evangeline Downs, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    12/3/03), that the Daubert factors 10 were set forth to assist in evaluating the admissibility of expert testimony and that the methodology employed by the expert was the paramount concern before the United States Supreme Court in Daubert.
  • Alaimo v. Racetrack at Evangeline Downs 893 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    DOTD, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), , that the Daubert factors were set forth to assist in evaluating the admissibility of expert testimony and that the methodology employed by the expert was the paramount concern before the United States Supreme Court in Daubert .
  • Commonwealth Insurance Co. v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 899 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    and Dev., 03-0680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), -41 .
  • Julie Guidry v. Coregis Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Inadequate Warnings 12 Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), Cheairs v. State, 03-680 (La.12/3/03)
  • Guidry v. Coregis Ins. Co. 896 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    [12] Clement v. Frey, 95-1119 (La.1/16/96), ; Cheairs v. State, 03-680 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Basco v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 879 So. 2d 1291 La. 2004
    Cheairs v. State of Louisiana, through Department of Transportation and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Noble v. Rideau 877 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Cheairs v. State ex rel DOTD, 2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
  • State v. Torregano 875 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    [7] Recently in Cheairs v. State DOTD, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), -542 , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized a distinction between challenging the reliability of the methodology used by the expert, which is addressed by a Daubert inquiry, and the qualifications of the expert to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address.