Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cheairs v. State Ex Rel. DOTD, 861 So. 2d 536.

162 citing documents.

Benoit v. Turner Industries Group, LLC 63 So. 3d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
and Dev., 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
William Boyd v. the Wackenhut Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Jeannie Heitman v. Christus Health Central D/B/A Christus St. Francis Cabrini Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Heitman v. Christus Health Central 49 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
& Dev., 03-680 (La.12/2/03), ).
State v. Lamonica 44 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
& Dev., 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), ; see State v. Vidrine, 08-1059 (La.App.
Lloyd Bordelon v. Howard J. Desselle, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
James Jefferson Price, IV v. Erbe USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Price v. ERBE USA, INC. 42 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
DOTD, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 35 So. 3d 230 La. 2010
Cheairs v. State, Department of Trasportation and Development, 03-0680, p. 15 (La.12/3/03), .
Benton Specialties, Inc.,et Al. v. Cajun Well Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Benton Specialties, Inc. v. Cajun Well Service, Inc. 31 So. 3d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
& Dev., 03-680 (La.12/2/03), .
Pollard v. Alpha Technical 31 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
DOTD, 03-680, p. 7 (La.12/3/03), -41 ; Rosell, 549 So.2d at 844 ; Katner v. Katner; p. 3 (La.App.
Katner v. Katner 28 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
DOTD, 03-680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), ; see also Radlein v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 07-0322, p. 7 (La.App.
Lavalais v. STATE, EX REL. DOTD 26 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
and Dev., 03-680 (La.12/3/03), .
Anthony Lavalais v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Lavalais v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 26 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
and Dev., 03-680 (La.12/3/03), .
State v. Prejean 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Williams v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. 22 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Cheairs v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 03-0680, p. 8 (La.12/3/03), -542 .
Versluis v. GULF COAST TRANSIT CO. 17 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and the Louisiana case Cheairs v. State Department of Transportation and Development, 2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Succession of Robert Edwards, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Shannon Menard v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Menard v. Lafayette Insurance 13 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
and Dev., 03-680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
In Re Succession of Edwards 11 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
and Dev., 03-680, p. 6-7 (La.12/3/03), -1 .
State v. Mosley 13 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Cheairs v. State DOTD, 03-0680, p. 8 (La.12/3/03), (rehearing granted in part on other grounds), the Supreme Court recognized a distinction between challenging the reliability of the methodology used by the expert, which is addressed by a Daubert inquiry, and the expert’s qualifications to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address.
Janell Ernst v. Dr. Flynn A. Taylor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Ernst v. Taylor 17 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
and Dev., 03-080 (La.12/3/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Lee Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Vidrine 9 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
& Dev., 03-680 (La.12/3/03), .
Walker v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 999 So. 2d 735 La. 2009
Cheairs v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Walker v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 999 So. 2d 735 La. 2009
Cheairs v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Johnson v. E.I. Dupont Denemours & Co. 7 So. 3d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
and Development, 03-680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), .
Kramer v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. 999 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Our Louisiana supreme court, in Cheairs v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, et.al, 03-680, p. 9 (La.12/3/03), , stated the following: (1) the expert is qualified to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address; (2) the methodology by which the expert reaches his conclusions is sufficiently reliable as determined by the sort of inquiry mandated in Daubert ; and (3) the testimony assists the trier of fac
Kent Louis Kramer, Jr. v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Our Louisiana supreme court, in Cheairs v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, et.al, 03-680, p.9 (La.12/3/03), stated the following: (1) the expert is qualified to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address; (2) the methodology by which the expert reaches his conclusions is sufficiently reliable as determined by the sort of inquiry mandated in Daubert; and (3) the testimony
Wyatt v. Hendrix 998 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
and Dev., XXXX-XXXX (La.12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the factors set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct.
Brown v. Trask 998 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
*137 and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Succession of Ruby Greer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Succession of Greer 987 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
DOTD, 03-680 (La.12/3/03), .
Everhardt v. LOUISIANA DOTD 978 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
and Dev., 03-0680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), , 541 citing 3 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Weinstein's Evidence ¶ 702[02] (1981).
Locke v. Young 973 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
and Development, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/3/03), .
Vernis S. Hinchee v. Soloco, L. L. C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hinchee v. SOLOCO, LLC 971 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
DOTD, 03-680 (La.12/3/03), .
Detraz v. Lee 950 So. 2d 557 La. 2007
and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Morgan v. Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development 951 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Griggs v. Harrah's Casino 929 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
In Cheairs v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development, 03-0680, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "[a] district court's decision to qualify an expert will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion."
Ainsworth v. Anderson 920 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
DOTD, 2003-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
State v. Addison 920 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
This Court noted in Torregano the Louisiana Supreme Court decision of Cheairs v. State DOTD, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), -542 , which recognized a distinction between challenging the reliability of the methodology used by the expert, which is addressed by a Daubert inquiry, and the expert's qualifications to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address.
In Re Succession of Pardue 915 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Cheairs v. State DOTD, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
LeBlanc v. Baxter 905 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
and Development, 03-0680 (La.12/3/03), .
Labor Finders v. Joseph Jean Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
12/3/03), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that Daubert, 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct.
Labor Finders v. Batiste 899 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
DOTD, 03-680 (La.12/3/03), , the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that Daubert, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct.