Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Turner v. Busby, 883 So. 2d 412.
-
Jerome Morgan, On Behalf Of Himself And Others Similarly Situated v. Blair's Bail Bonds, Inc., Bankers Insurance Company, …
La. 2025
9/9/04), ); Rebel Distributors Corp. v. LUBA Workers’ Comp.
- State of Louisiana, by and Through Its Attorney General, Liz Murrill v. Abbvie, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
-
Northwestern Louisiana Cancer Center, LLC v. Louisiana Tax Commission
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
- Glenda Bandaries Pickett v. Roy Layne Pickett La. 2023
- Affordable Care, LLC v. Jeffrey Lee Martin, DDS, A Professional Dental Corporation La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
-
William P. Dering v. Kay W. Dering
La. 2021
art. 927; Turner v. Busby, 03–3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04)
-
State of Louisiana v. Louisiana Land & Exploration, Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
- Stanley R. Palowsky, III, Individually, and on Behalf of Alternative Environmental Solutions, Inc. v. Allyson Campbell La. 2019
- Myles v. Howell 265 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- Williams v. Wood 258 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
-
KHRISTY GOINS RISMILLER, TUTRIX FOR DANIEL EDWARDS GOINS VERSUS GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY Consolidated With DAVID WATTS VERSUS MARK …
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
9/9/04), are persuasive in holding that “it is the biological relationship and dependency which is determinative of the child’s rights in these cases, and not the classification into which the child is placed by the statutory law of the State.” Thus, the fact that Watts [and Goins] w[ere] adopted do
-
KHRISTY GOINS RISMILLER, TUTRIX FOR DANIEL EDWARDS GOINS VERSUS GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY Consolidated With DAVID WATTS VERSUS MARK …
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
9/9/04), are persuasive in holding that “it is the biological relationship and dependency which is determinative of the child’s rights in these cases, and not the classification into which the child is placed by the statutory law of the State.” Thus, the fact that Watts [and Goins] w[ere] adopted do
-
KHRISTY GOINS RISMILLER, TUTRIX FOR DANIEL EDWARDS GOINS VERSUS GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY Consolidated With DAVID WATTS VERSUS MARK …
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
9/9/04), are persuasive in holding that “it is the biological relationship and dependency which is determinative of the child’s rights in these cases, and not the classification into which the child is placed by the statutory law of the State.” Thus, the fact that Watts [and Goins] w[ere] adopted do
- State v. Fournier Industrie Et Sante & Labs. Fournier, S.A., Abbott Labs., Abbvie, Inc. 256 So. 3d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Astra Zeneca AB 249 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- Lingo v. Lingo 249 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- Washington v. Magnolia Manor Nursing Home & Rehab., L.L.C. 247 So. 3d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
Helen Moore v. MacQuarie Infrastructure Real Assets
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
-
Moore v. Macquarie Infrastructure Real Assets
258 So. 3d 750
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc. , 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), , 1217 ; Turner v. Busby , 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), , 415-416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections , 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), , 246.
-
In re the Succession of Dangerfield
207 So. 3d 427
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
9/9/04), , Mr. Bowman argues that in order for an authentic act acknowledging paternity to serve as a formal acknowledgment, the act must reveal an intent to legitimize by notarial act.
-
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Bickham
163 So. 3d 119
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Louisiana Supreme Court indicates that this exception is used to determine “whether plaintiff belongs to the class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the petition.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-0719, p. 6 (La.3/17/06), , citing Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), .
-
Walton v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
162 So. 3d 490
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 03-3444 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections, 03-1615, (La.2/20/04), .
-
Bass Custom Signs, LLC v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
-
Bass Custom Signs, LLC v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government
149 So. 3d 965
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Willis v. City of New Orleans
143 So. 3d 1232
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
ants the cause of action asserted in the petition” and explained that it “serves to question whether the plaintiff in the particular case is a member of the class of persons that has a legal interest in the subject matter of the litigation.” Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 05-0612, 05-0719, pp. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), , citing Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), .
-
Susan Arnaud, Et Ux. v. Ronald Dies
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), - 416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003- 1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
-
Arnaud v. Dies
153 So. 3d 453
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Nellie Pierce v. Atlantic Richfield Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005–0612, p. 6–7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003–3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), – 416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003– 1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
-
Pierce v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
161 So. 3d 679
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p, 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Williams v. Board of Supervisors of University of Louisiana System
135 So. 3d 804
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Turner v. Bushy, 03-3444 (La.09/09/04), ; Reese v. State, Dept, of Public Safety & Corrections, 03-1615 (La.02/20/04), .
-
Marcus Miller v. Harold J. Thibeaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04)
-
Miller v. Thibeaux
153 So. 3d 1134
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04); .
- Black Water Marsh, LLC v. Roger C. Ferriss Properties, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
Black Water Marsh, LLC v. Roger C. Ferriss Properties, Inc.
130 So. 3d 968
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
| Exception of No Right of Action It is well settled that “[tjhe function of an exception of no right of action is to determine whether the plaintiff belongs to the class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the suit.” Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), .
- Robert Hollier v. Louis J. Perret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
-
Thibco Investments, LLC v. Robert Thibodeaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
9/9/04), -416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.
-
Thibco Investments, LLC v. Thibodeaux
102 So. 3d 1043
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Bushy, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Udomeh v. Joseph
103 So. 3d 343
La. 2012
Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04); .
-
Darnell Carter v. Steak House Steaks, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04)
-
Carter v. Steak House Steaks, Inc.
107 So. 3d 97
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
-
Succession of Horrell
79 So. 3d 1162
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 927; Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), .
-
Eagle Pipe and Supply, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corporation
79 So. 3d 246
La. 2011
Id.; Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc., 2005-0612, p. 6-7 (La.3/17/06), ; Turner v. Busby, 2003-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), -416 ; Reese v. State, Dept. of Public Safety and Corrections, 2003-1615, p. 3 (La.2/20/04), .
- Brielles Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Teche, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
-
Brielle's Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Tech, Inc.
74 So. 3d 833
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 927; Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), .
-
First Bank and Trust v. Duwell
70 So. 3d 15
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
that exception as “a determination of whether plaintiff belongs to the class of persons to whom the law grants the cause of action asserted in the petition” and explained that it “serves to question whether the plaintiff in the particular case is a member of the class of persons that has a legal interest in the subject matter of the litigation.” (citing Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04), ).
-
O'Connor v. Nelson
60 So. 3d 27
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Turner v. Busby, 03-3444 (La.9/9/04), .
- Sherar v. Besse 15 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Glenn M. Hebert v. J. Elise Shelton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
Hebert v. Shelton
11 So. 3d 1197
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Turner v. Busby, 03-3444 (La.9/9/04), .
-
Succession of Joseph Ames Guidry
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
art. 927; Turner v. Busby, 03-3444, p. 4 (La.9/9/04)