Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cc Towing & Rec. Inc. v. State Dept. of Public Safety & Corr., 842 So. 2d 321.

62 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Tatianna Jenell Burns La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Scott James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. El Jerico Jermiah Bartie A/K/A El Jerico Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State v. Pierre, 2002–2665 (La.3/28/03)
State of Louisiana v. Victor Wayne Loyd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3/28/03), When the trial judge does not follow the preferred method, an appellate court may nevertheless conduct a de novo review of the record to ascertain whether the defendant was advised of his or her right to jury trial; whether the defendant was present when his or her counsel elected a judge (bench) trial; and, if
State v. Loyd 274 So. 3d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3/28/03), , 322 When the trial judge does not follow the preferred method, an appellate court may nevertheless conduct a de novo review of the record to ascertain whether the defendant was advised of his or her right to jury trial; whether the defendant was present when his or her counsel elected a judge (bench) trial; and, if
State v. White 269 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Pierre, 2002–2665 (La.3/28/03)
State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Pierre, 2002–2665 (La.3/28/03)
State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Brignac 241 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3/28/03), , 322 ( per curiam ).
State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/28/03), , that “[ajlthough it remains the preferred method for the district court to advise a defendant of her right to trial by jury in open court before obtaining a waiver, such a practice is not statutorily required.” Id.
State v. Brundy 198 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. Pierre, 2002-2666, p. 1 (La.3/28/03), , however, that “[although it remains the preferred method for the district court to advise a defendant of her right to trial by jury in open court before obtaining a waiver, such a practice is not statutorily | .¡required.” “Whether or not there is an intelligent, competent, self-protecting waiver of the right t
State of Louisiana v. Manzy C. Watson AKA - Manzy Lashawn Watson AKA - Manzy L. Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); State v. Lokey, 04-616 (La.App.
State v. Watson 175 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); State v. Lokey, 04-616 (La.App.
State v. Spurlock 175 So. 3d 955 La. 2015
State v. Pierre, 2002-2665 (La.3/28/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Bengy R. Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Cooley 165 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Bardwell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Cf. State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (the preferred (not required) method is the court‘s advisement of the right to a jury trial in open court and the defendant‘s personal waiver).
State v. Miorana 156 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The Louisiana Supreme Court noted in State v. Pierre, 02-2665, p. 1 (La.3/28/03), , however, that “[a]lthough it remains the preferred method for the district court to advise a defendant of her right to trial by | Jury in open court before obtaining a waiver, such a practice is not statutorily required.” “Whether or not there is an intelligent, competent, self-protecting waiver of the right to
State v. Whitley 156 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Pierre, 2002-2665, p. 1 (La.3/28/03), ; (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Willie Calvin Jones, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Cf. State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (the preferred (not required) method is the court’s advisement of the right to a jury trial in open court and the defendant’s personal waiver).1 Thus, we conclude that the error in failing to obtain a written waiver in violation of La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Bell, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3/28/03), (the preferred (not required) method is the court‟s advisement of the right to a jury 2 trial in open court and the defendant‟s personal waiver).1 Thus, we conclude that the error in failing to obtain a written waiver in violation of La.Code Crim.P.
State v. Bell 140 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Cf. State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (the preferred (not required) method is the court’s advisement of the right to a jury | atrial in open court and the defendant’s personal waiver).
State v. Robinson 136 So. 3d 302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.03/28/03), .
State v. Biddy 129 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pierre, 02-2665, p. 1 (La.3/28/03), ; (La.App.
State v. Carter 121 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 3/29/05) , , writ denied, 05-1450 (La.1/13/06), (citations omitted), State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); -47 (La.1977); State v. Howard, 10-869 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Alton Ray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3/28/03), (per curiam); State v. Lokey, 04-616 (La.App.
State v. Ray 157 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); State v. Lokey, 04-616 (LaApp.
State of Louisiana v. Rosheed Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
In State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), the supreme court reversed a panel of this court and re-instated a conviction after finding a voluntary waiver.
State v. Guillory 129 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), , the supreme court reversed a panel of this court and re-instated a conviction after finding a voluntary waiver.
State of Louisiana v. Ben James Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3/28/03), the supreme court stated: Although it remains the preferred method for the district court to advise a defendant of her right to trial by jury in open court before obtaining a waiver, such a practice is not statutorily required.
State v. Thompson 100 So. 3d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
|4In State v. Pierre, 02-2665, p. 1 (La.3/28/03), , the supreme court stated: Although it remains the preferred method for the district court to advise a defendant of her right to trial by jury in open court before obtaining a waiver, such a practice is not statutorily required.
State of Louisiana v. A.D. L La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); State v. Lokey, 04-616 (La.App.
State v. A.D.L. 92 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); State v. Lokey, 04-616 (La.App.
State v. Howard 66 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); State v. Lokey, 04-616 (La.App.
State v. Martin 70 So. 3d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pierre, 02-2665, p. 1 (La.3/28/03), , 322 see La.C.Cr.P.
State of Louisiana v. Arthur Bias, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bias 63 So. 3d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), .
State v. White 58 So. 3d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Pierre, 2002-2665 (La.3/28/03), .
MARCILE v. Dauzat 44 So. 3d 678 La. 2010
See Capitol City Towing & Recovery v. State, 03-0075 (La.3/21/03), (holding if the matter can be resolved on statutory grounds rather than constitutional grounds, a declaration of constitutionality is not proper).
State v. Howard 37 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), (per curiam); State v. Lokey, 04-616 (La.App.
State v. JBB 25 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3/28/03), (citations omitted), the supreme court observed: Although it remains the preferred method for the district court to advise a defendant of her right to trial by jury in open court before obtaining a waiver, such a practice is not statutorily required.
State of Louisiana v. J.B. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3/28/03), (citations omitted), the supreme court observed: Although it remains the preferred method for the district court to advise a defendant of her right to trial by jury in open court before obtaining a waiver, such a practice is not statutorily required.
State v. Olden 11 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3/28/03), , 322 (per curiam); Kahey, 436 So.2d at 486-87 .
State of Louisiana v. Connor L. Wood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Wood 11 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Pierre, 02-2665 (La.3/28/03), .
State v. LANUS 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
3/28/03), , 322 (per curiam).
State v. Campbell 960 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Kahey, supra ; State v. Pierre, 2002-2665 (La.3/28/03), ; State v. Davis, 41,180 (La.App.2d Cir.11/3/06), .
State v. Davis 942 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Pierre, 2002-2665 (La.3/28/03), .