DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 864 So. 2d 117.

31 citing documents.

  • Jill Stauder and Shelly Stauder, Individually and on Behalf of the David Stauder, Jr. v. Shell Oil Company, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
    12/3/03), [internal citations omitted].
  • Cindy Shirley McConnell v. State of Louisiana,dept. of Social Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    12/3/03), the supreme court considered the issue of when a claim for loss of consortium accrues.
  • White v. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. 167 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    McGee, 933 So.2d at 780 (citing Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719 (La.12/3/03), ).
  • Oleszkowicz v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 129 So. 3d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
    whenever the law imposes additional burdens based on conduct that occurred in the past.” Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 03-719 (La.12/3/03); n. 3 .
  • Allemand v. DISCOVERY HOMES, INC. 38 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 2003-0719, p. 9 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Lafayette Parish School Board v. Ratcliff Construction Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    12/3/03), quoting Bourgeois v. A.P.
  • Lafayette Parish School Board v. Ratcliff Construction Co. 30 So. 3d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 12/13/06), , writ denied, 07-0080 (La.3/9/07), : “Under Louisiana law, a cause of action accrues when a party has the right to sue.” Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, 03-0993, 03-1002, p. 4, (La.12/3/03), , quoting Bourgeois v. A.P.
  • Yell v. Sumich 997 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Further, the standard for addressing "when" a cause of action arises under Landry [ v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 03-0719 (La.12/3/03), ] and Walls [ v. American Optical Corp., 98-0455 (La.9/8/99), ] addresses theories of recovery for determining a party's right to recovery, whereas "where" a cause of action arises for venue purposes addresses a consideration of the most convenient situs for trial.
  • Alma Hardy v. Horace Mann Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Hardy v. Horace Mann Ins. Co. 956 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    This court looked for guidance in Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 03-719, 03-993, 03-1002, (La.12/3/03), .
  • Colvin v. LOUISIANA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND 947 So. 2d 15 La. 2007
    The court of appeal relied on Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 03-0719 (La.12/3/03), and Walls v. American Optical Corp., 98-0455 (La.9/8/99), , which hold that a cause of action accrues when a party has a right to sue and that a negligence cause of action will arise only upon the happening of a wrongful act and the existence of an injury resulting in legally cognizable damages.
  • Patriot v. Mississippi Land Holdings 948 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, 03-0993, 03-1002, p. 4, (La.12/3/03), , quoting Bourgeois v. A.P.
  • Kelly Bailey v. Aig Insurance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    12/3/03), -26, as follows: In Ferrell, we were interpreting the single person policy limits of an insurance policy and held that, because the loss of consortium claim was “derivative of the primary victim’s injury,” it was restricted to the single person policy limits of the defendant’s policy.
  • Bailey v. AIG INSURANCE 943 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    12/3/03), -26 , as follows: In Ferrell , we were interpreting the single person policy limits of an insurance policy and held that, because the loss of consortium claim was "derivative of the primary victim's injury," it was restricted to the single person policy limits of the defendant's policy.
  • McGee v. AC AND S, INC. 933 So. 2d 770 La. 2006
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, p. 10 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Abram v. Epec Oil Co. 936 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.12/3/03), .
  • Colvin v. Louisiana Patients Compensation Oversight Board 927 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 03-0719 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Dr. Kevin Williams v. Louisiana Patients' Comp. Fund Oversight Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Williams v. Louisiana Patients' Compensation Fund Oversight Board 921 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, 03-0993, 03-1002 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Louviere v. State 923 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 03-0719, p. 4 (La.12/3/03), .
  • Mason v. Luther 903 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Furthermore, in Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-719, 03-993, 03-1002, p. 4 (La.12/3/03), , the supreme court recalled the well-settled rule: that a cause of action for loss of consortium does not accrue until a plaintiff suffers the actual loss of consortium, which has been held to occur at the time an injured party's condition deteriorates to such an extent that his family is actually deprived of hi
  • Janie Audra Mason v. James A. Luther La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    12/3/03), the supreme court recalled the well-settled rule: that a cause of action for loss of consortium does not accrue until a plaintiff suffers the actual loss of consortium, which has been held to occur at the time an injured party’s condition deteriorates to such an extent that his family i
  • Succession of Amable A. Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • Succession of Comeaux 896 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Landry v. Avondale Ind., Inc., 03-0719, p. 6 (La.12/03/03), .
  • Tammatha Messina v. Isle of Capri Casino La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    “‘Substantive laws,’ for purposes of determining whether a law should be applied retroactively, are those which establish new rules, rights, and duties, or change existing ones.” Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Indus., 00-2799 (La.10/16/01), citing Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Messina v. Isle of Capri Casino 891 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Indus., 00-2799 (La.10/16/01), ; citing Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Don R. Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Ind.
  • Young v. Gulf Coast Carpets 888 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-719, 03-993, 03-1002, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Ind., 00-2799, p. 3 (La.10/16/01), ).
  • Explained Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 877 So. 2d 970 La. 2004
    Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 03-0719, 03-0993, 03-1002 (La.12/3/03), (" Landry I ").
  • Samuel Chesne v. Elevated Tank Applicators, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Indus., 00-2799 (La.
  • Chesne v. Elevated Tank Applicators, Inc. 874 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Landry v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 03-0719, p. 6 (La.12/3/03), (quoting Anderson v. Avondale Indus., 00-2799 (La.10/16/01), ; Aucoin v. State Through Dept. of Transp.