Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 845 So. 2d 1061.

721 citing documents.

State v. Ayala 244 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Teddy Aguillard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-0562 (La.5/30/03)
State v. Aguillard 242 So. 3d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Kyvonte Latrell Eaglin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Eaglin 239 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Clevance Cormier, Jr La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-0562 (La.5/30/03)
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Walker Stafford -Aka- Derrick Stafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals: 35 In deciding whether a sentence
State v. Stafford 241 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court discussed the factors it would consider in order to determine whether a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals:In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appella
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Debarge -Aka- Jeffery Scot Debarge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State v. Debarge 238 So. 3d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, "it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed."
State of Louisiana v. Robert Earl Sanders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Sanders 238 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Timothy H. Queen -Aka- Timothy Hugh Queen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana v. Kelvin Latrial McAdory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. McAdory 237 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Queen 237 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, "it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed."
State v. Mace 258 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, "it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed."
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Shon MacE La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana v. Bobby Hayward McMurtury, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Sean J. Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State
State of Louisiana v. Patrick Seth Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Jones 229 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Deonta Ware La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court discussed the considerations an appellate court should take into account when reviewing excessive sentence claims, stating: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court m
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Eugene Dowden, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court elaborated on that analysis, stating: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, t
State v. Dowden 224 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/30/03), , a panel of this court elaborated on that analysis, stating: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind
State of Louisiana v. Austin Benjamin Cedars La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ State v.
State of Louisiana v. Darrin Kashy Duhon -Aka- Darrin Duhon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Duhon 224 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Bill Eric Winters La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Megan E. Morales -Aka- Megan Elizabeth Morales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court elaborated on that analysis, stating: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, t
State v. Winters 221 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Morales 221 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/30/03), , a panel of this court elaborated on that analysis, stating: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind
State of Louisiana v. Jacob Dewayne Purvis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State v. Purvis 217 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Willie Lee Price, Jr. -Aka- Willie Price La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana v. Kenton Dawne Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
State of Louisiana v. Ernest Ray Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03–562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Williams 216 So. 3d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State v. Price 216 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ernest Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), this court held: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the pu
State of Louisiana v. Tedrick Jewan Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/30/03), the supreme court elaborated that: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose
State of Louisiana v. Francisco Jesus Vasquez-Ramirez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/30/03), we articulated the factors that should be considered: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the le
State v. Richardson 210 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5/30/03), , the supreme court elaborated that: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment and a comp
State v. Vasquez-Ramirez 210 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5/30/03), , we articulated the factors that should be considered: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the pu
State of Louisiana v. Henry Lawrence Leger AKA Henry Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Travis R. McKee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/30/03), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Earl Lewis, IV La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. B
State of Louisiana v. Brandy Mize La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Steven Blunt AKA Steven L. Blunt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Blunt 201 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016