DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 845 So. 2d 1061.

721 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Soamer Notier Rivera Soriano AKA Soamer N. Rivera-Soriano AKA Soamer R. Soriano La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    5/30/03), a panel of this court elaborated on that analysis, stating: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender
  • State v. Soriano 192 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , a panel of this court elaborated on that analysis, stating: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind
  • State of Louisiana v. Rosalyn Faith Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: 13 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the part
  • State of Louisiana v. Stephon Enrique Fallon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    1 Cir.1991), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry Joseph McKithern AKA - Larry McKithern AKA - Larry J. McKithern La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Walter Urena La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Urena 215 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Fallon 189 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    1 Cir.1991), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Fahim A. Shaikh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State v. Shaikh 188 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Lamantraes Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    5/30/03), stating that: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punis
  • State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    5/30/03), this court stated: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the
  • State of Louisiana v. Dwane Edward Fox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court stated: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking, or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment and a comparison of the s
  • State v. Fox 184 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 2/12/03) , , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), ; Similarly, as the trial court is “in the best position to assess the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented by each case,” it is within the trial court’s purview to particularize each sentence.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day AKA - Jamie Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
  • State v. Day 182 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Leonard Ingram La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Ingram 181 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Heller Marie Dupuis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Edward Jackson -Aka- Charles E. Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Ryan Crenna Garcia AKA - Ryan C. Garcia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ State v.
  • State of Louisiana v. Barry G. Roy AKA - Barry Roy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State v. Roy 177 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , State v. Decuir, 10-1112, pp. 11-13 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Mouton AKA Terrence Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Glenn Von Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Dionte Eugene Daugherty La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Morris James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Mouton 175 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Daugherty 175 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. James 175 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Cedric Daniels La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
  • State v. Daniels 215 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky Lee Cox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tristain D. Bartley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court elaborated on what constitutes an excessive sentence: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circu
  • State of Louisiana v. Alfred Mayo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    5/30/03), this court added further structure to the analysis: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the leg
  • State v. Bartley 165 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted), this court elaborated on what constitutes an excessive sentence: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the leg
  • State v. Mayo 165 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court added further structure to the analysis: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the puni
  • State of Louisiana v. Jared Paul Pontiff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Glyndale Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
  • State of Louisiana v. Nolan J. Cormier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State v. Pontiff 166 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Cormier 164 So. 3d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Arceneaux 164 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Zhegao Quan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Moten AKA Robert Mouton AKA Robert L. Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Johnny Ray Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Lowell Frazier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Demonte Jamar Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    5/30/03), this court stated: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the
  • State of Louisiana v. Phillip A. Maggio La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)