DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 884 So. 2d 568.

80 citing documents.

  • State v. Favors 11 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    10/19/04), (for sentencing enhancement purposes, the subsequent felony must have been committed after the predicate conviction or convictions).
  • Tensas Poppadoc, Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), Theriot, 694 So.2d at 186.
  • Tensas Poppadoc, Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc. 10 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), ; Theriot, 694 So.2d at 186 .
  • Hunter v. Morton's Seafood Restaurant & Catering 6 So. 3d 152 La. 2009
    State v. Johnson, 2003-2993, p. 11 (La.10/29/04); ; Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance *156 Co., 1995-2895, p. 3 (La.5/20/97); .
  • MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 998 So. 2d 16 La. 2008
    State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), ; Theriot, 694 So.2d at 186 .
  • State v. Robbins 986 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2 Cir. 8/23/06), [5] and State v. Johnson, *836 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), .
  • State v. Fussell 974 So. 2d 1223 La. 2008
    State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 12 (La.10/19/04), ; see also State v. Dick, 06-2223, p. 9 (La.1/26/07), .
  • City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUND 986 So. 2d 1 La. 2008
    State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 12 (La.10/19/04), ; Theriot , 95-2895 at p. 3, 694 So.2d at 186 .
  • State v. Shaw 969 So. 2d 1233 La. 2007
    The underpinnings of that decision were called into question by our recent decision in State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), , which repudiated the jurisprudentially created "one day, one conviction" rule in determining a defendant's habitual offender status.
  • FNB OF PICAYUNE v. Pearl River Fabricators 971 So. 2d 302 La. 2007
    State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), ; Theriot, 694 So.2d at 186 .
  • State v. King 969 So. 2d 1228 La. 2007
    State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 18 (La.10/19/04), ; State v. Everett, 2000-2998, p. 7 (La.5/14/02), ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8 (La.3/4/98), .
  • State v. Shaw 957 So. 2d 160 La. 2007
  • State v. LeBlanc 951 So. 2d 1087 La. 2007
    In State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), , this Court overruled State ex rel.
  • State v. Dick 951 So. 2d 124 La. 2007
    State v. Johnson, 03-2993, p. 12 (La.10/19/04), ; Theriot , 95-2895 at p. 3, 694 So.2d at 186 .
  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    10/19/04), because the purse snatching charge arose on January 30, 1991 and the simple burglary charge arose on April 4, 1991, each conviction can be used as a separate offense to habitualize the Defendant, even though he was convicted of both offenses on the same day.
  • State v. Hood 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    10/19/04), , because the purse snatching charge arose on January 30, 1991 and the simple burglary charge arose on April 4, 1991, each conviction can be used as a separate offense to habitualize the Defendant, even though he was convicted of both offenses on the same day.
  • Overruled State v. Shaw 939 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Porter v. Butler, supra , is "no longer good law," as it was specifically overruled in State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), , and legislatively suppressed by 2005 La.
  • State v. Spano 936 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    10/19/04 State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), : overruled Mims; convictions count individually even though guilty pleas were on the same day-PROVIDED same-day CONVICTIONS are BASED UPON UNRELATED CONDUCT, NOT A SINGLE COURSE OF ACTION.
  • State v. Williams 930 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    In 2004, the Johnson case was rendered ( State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), ).
  • Moss v. State 925 So. 2d 1185 La. 2006
    1993); Theriot v. Midland Risk Insurance Company, 95-2895 (La.5/20/97), ; State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), .
  • Donovan Monceaux v. R & R Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    10/19/04), -77, the supreme court set out several rules governing statutory construction: First, those who enact statutory provisions are presumed to act deliberately and with full knowledge of existing laws on the same subject, with awareness of court cases and well-established principles of statut
  • Monceaux v. R & R CONST., INC. 919 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    In State v. Johnson, 03-2993, pp. 14-15 (La.10/19/04), -77 , the supreme court set out several rules governing statutory construction: First, those who enact statutory provisions are presumed to act deliberately and with full knowledge of existing laws on the same subject, with awareness of court cases and well-established principles of statutory construction, and wit
  • State v. Williams 916 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    In State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), , the supreme court held that, under the habitual offender statute, multiple convictions obtained on the same date but based on unrelated conduct can be counted separately for sentence enhancement, thereby overruling State ex rel.
  • State v. Galle 904 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    10/19/04), , applies to this issue.
  • State v. Dorsey 907 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Not only did the supreme court in Everett pose questions concerning the sequencing scheme, but in State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), , the supreme court expressly overruled Mims, which held that the amended habitual offender statute did not eliminate the sequencing requirement necessary for enhancement of sentencing under the Habitual Offender Law.
  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    10/19/04), wherein the supreme court revisited its holding in State ex rel.
  • State v. Hood 895 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Porter, ; ; and State v. Johnson, 03-2993 (La.10/19/04), .
  • State v. Butler 894 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Recently, our Supreme Court reconsidered the validity of Mims based on the Everett dicta, in State v. Johnson, 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), .
  • State v. LeBlanc 897 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Johnson, 2003-2993, p. 17-18 (La.10/19/04), -579 (overruling State ex rel.
  • State v. Lowery 890 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court granted certiorari in State v. Johnson, *722 2003-2993 (La.10/19/04), , to consider the continuing validity of their decision in Mims.