DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 893 So. 2d 7.

485 citing documents.

  • State v. Deen 16 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Freeman 13 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Darryl Boudreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    12/13/04), -17, the supreme court stated the standard of review for a sentence is as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of 7 sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside
  • State v. Boudreaux 11 So. 3d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), -17 , the supreme court stated the standard of review for a sentence is as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of |Rsentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.
  • State v. Collins 12 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. McCall, 37,442 (La.App.
  • State v. Ealy 12 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), .
  • State v. Black 12 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. McCall, 37-442 (La.App.
  • State v. Lee 15 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has stated that, “[o]n review, an appellate court does not determine whether another sentence may have been more appropriate, but whether the trial court abused its discretion.” State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Coys Thomas, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    12/13/04), -17 (citation omitted).
  • State v. Thomas 18 So. 3d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), -17 (citation omitted).
  • State v. Anderson 6 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 6 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.01/26/05), .
  • State v. McCALMAN 7 So. 3d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. ┴4Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, *851 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Thomas 7 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), .
  • State v. Bass 4 So. 3d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.01/26/05), .
  • State v. Lewis 1 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. McCall, 37-442 (La.App.2d Cir.8/20/03), , writ denied, 04-0039 (La.12/17/04), .
  • State v. Johnson 999 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/26/05), .
  • State v. Smith 999 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Adams 997 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. McCall, 37-442 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 996 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams , XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Caston 996 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.
  • State v. Carroll 996 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. McCall, 37-442 (La.App.
  • State v. Carroll 996 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. McCall, 37-442 (La.App.
  • State v. Littleton 996 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/26/05), .
  • State v. Franklin 996 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), .
  • State v. Ates 989 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Howard 987 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Minniefield 986 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, *234 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Creamer 980 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), -17 (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry Allen Creamer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), -17 (citations omitted).
  • State v. Germany 981 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. McCall, 37-442 (La.App.
  • State v. Sims 981 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. McCall, 37-442 (La.App.
  • State v. Mason 981 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.04/09/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gregory T. Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Robbins 979 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Scott 978 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/26/05), .
  • State v. Jackson 976 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    12/13/04), -17, as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.
  • State v. Clark 976 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    The supreme court discussed the standard applicable to excessive sentencing claims in State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), -17 , as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.
  • State v. Harris 974 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), , citing State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Parker 974 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Fussell 974 So. 2d 1223 La. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 2 (La.12/13/04), ; see also State v. Brown, 03-2788, p. 6 (La.7/6/04), , reh'g denied, 9/3/04; State v. Broussard, 213 La.
  • State v. Carter 974 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 975 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    (State v. Williams, 2003-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 2002-0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
  • State v. Montgomery 974 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), .
  • State v. Gill 974 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.
  • State v. Scott 973 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State v. Newton 973 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robin Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    12/13/04), -17, as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.
  • State v. Stephens 973 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. McCall, 37,442 (La.App.2d Cir.08/20/03), , writ denied, 04-0039 (La.12/17/04), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul R. Blossom, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    12/13/04), -17, as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.