Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 893 So. 2d 7.
-
State v. Blossom
966 So. 2d 1251
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/13/04), -17 , as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.
-
State v. Young
969 So. 2d 789
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03)
-
State v. Houston
970 So. 2d 667
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
The supreme court discussed the standard applicable to excessive sentencing claims in State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), -17 , as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.
-
State of Louisiana v. Thomas O. Houston
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/13/04), -17, as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.
-
State of Louisiana v. Raymond Rogers
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/13/04), “[t]he trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.” In this matter, the trial court sentenced the defendant to serve ten years at ha
-
State v. Rogers
969 So. 2d 707
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
As stated by the supreme court in State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), , "[t]he trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion."
-
State v. Booker
968 So. 2d 1190
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
-
State v. Zeigler
968 So. 2d 875
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), , citing State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), , (La.
-
State v. Hicks
968 So. 2d 307
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams , XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), .
-
State v. Taylor
968 So. 2d 1135
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), , citing State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), , State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Craig L. Bailey
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/13/04), -17 (citations omitted).
-
State of Louisiana v. John Reed
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/13/04), -17 (citations omitted).
-
State of Louisiana v. James Manuel Turnbo
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/13/04), -17, as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.
-
State of Louisiana v. Matthew W. Schilling
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/13/04), -17 (citations omitted).
- State of Louisiana v. Harry Coward La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State v. Bailey
968 So. 2d 247
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), -17 (citations omitted).
-
State v. Coward
967 So. 2d 580
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), .
-
State v. Turnbo
966 So. 2d 1220
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
The supreme court discussed the standard applicable to excessive sentencing claims in State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), -17 , as follows: The trial judge is given a wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within the statutory limits, and the sentence imposed by him should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of his discretion.
-
State v. Brown
966 So. 2d 727
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), .
-
State v. Henry
966 So. 2d 692
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), , citing State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), , State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), .
-
State v. Burgess
965 So. 2d 621
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), , citing State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), , State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.2d Cir.1/26/05), -713 .
-
State v. Johnson
962 So. 2d 1126
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/9/03), ; State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
-
State v. McKinney
961 So. 2d 589
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), , citing State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03), , State v. Hardy, 39,233 (La.App.
-
State v. McMillion
961 So. 2d 546
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.04/09/03)
-
State v. Cloward
960 So. 2d 356
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03)
-
State v. Franklin
956 So. 2d 823
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), ; State v. Thompson, 02 -0333 (La.4/9/03)
- State of Louisiana v. D.R.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State v. HB
955 So. 2d 255
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), -17 .
- State of Louisiana v. H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State v. H.B.
955 So. 2d 255
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 14 (La.12/13/04), -17 .
-
State of Louisiana v. Mickey Wayne Johnson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
12/13/04), -17 (citations omitted).
- State of Louisiana v. Herbert Davenport, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State v. Davenport
941 So. 2d 629
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Williams, 03-3514 (La.12/13/04), .
- State of Louisiana v. Robert S. Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
State v. Willis
915 So. 2d 365
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Williams, 03-3514, p. 5 (La.12/13/04), .