Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 907 So. 2d 1.

222 citing documents.

State v. Papillion 63 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In support of his argument, Defendant refers to State v. Brown, 03-897 (La.4/12/05), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
we find that the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant attempted to commit the second degree 12 murder of Charles when he shot him in the face, as “‘[d]eliberately pointing and firing a deadly weapon at close range are circumstances which will support a finding of specific intent to kill.’ State v. Brown, 03-897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), ” State v. Roberts, 06-765, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Thomas 63 So. 3d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Accordingly, we find that the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant attempted to commit the second degree | ismurder of Charles when he shot him in the face, as “ ‘[deliberately pointing and firing a deadly weapon at close range are circumstances which will support a finding of specific intent to kill.’ State v. Brown, 03-897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), .” State v. Roberts, 06-765, p. 5 (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Cj 63 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), .
State ex rel. D.D. 65 So. 3d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Hill 64 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
State ex rel. C.J. 63 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Sylvester 63 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
|4The Supreme Court set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Phillips 61 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Brawn, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , the Court set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Peters 60 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence was set forth by the Court in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State ex rel. J.D. 63 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence.
State v. Fortune 54 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Summers 52 So. 3d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Bell 53 So. 3d 437 La. 2010
State v. Robertson, 97-0177 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Monroe 52 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Reynolds 55 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
1969 , 146 L.Ed.2d 800 (2000); State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), , cert.
State v. Jones 48 So. 3d 210 La. 2010
State v. Brown 03-897, p. 19 (La.4/12/05), ; (1984).
State Ex Rel. Km 49 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
State ex rel. K.M. 49 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
State ex rel. S.O. 49 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are *3 controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Dunn 41 So. 3d 454 La. 2010
ony Scott, which also entailed a remand to resolve the question of whether he too is mentally retarded and so exempt from capital punishment, that “the defendant’s behavior during and following the commission of the crime can be relevant to the determination of mental retardation.” State v. Scott, 04-1312, p. 85 (La.1/19/06), (citing State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 46 (La.4/12/05), (“Notwithstanding the fact that the defendant’s experts failed to allege that he suffered from mental retardation, his
State v. Freeman 34 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), , and citations therein.
State v. Every 35 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Robinson 33 So. 3d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Weathersby 29 So. 3d 499 La. 2010
State v. Brown, 03-0897, pp. 18-19 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Haynes 34 So. 3d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Miranda v. Arizona, supra; State v. Brown, 03-0897, pp. 15-16 (La.4/12/05), , cert.
State v. Sopczak 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4/12/05), -12 , cert, denied, 547 U.S. 1022 , 126 S.Ct.
State Ex Rel. Cb 28 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), .
State ex rel. C.B. 28 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2 The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Duncan 15 So. 3d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Gilmore 11 So. 3d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Reeves 11 So. 3d 1031 La. 2009
See State v. Brown, 2003-0897 p. 15 (La.4/12/05), , cert.
State Ex Rel. Wb 11 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
In State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence.
State ex rel. W.B. 11 So. 3d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence.
State v. Rabun 5 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Henry Leo Eaglin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Eaglin 4 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
As noted by the supreme court in State v. Brown, 03-897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , cert.
State v. Addison 8 So. 3d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Brown, 03-897, pp. 15-16 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Morrison 999 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
See also State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Sartain 2 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Brewer 2 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
|sThe Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State v. Harris 998 So. 2d 55 La. 2008
State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
State v. Nelson 3 So. 3d 57 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
pin State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , the court set *60 forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. David Stapleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Brown, 03-897 (La.4/12/05), (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct.
State v. Major 1 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), ; see also State v. Sykes, 04-1199 (La.App.
State v. Stapleton 997 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Brown, 03-897 (La.4/12/05), (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct.
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
2242 , 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002)); State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), (couple kidnaped from their home, both shot and then found burned in their torched vehicle); State v. Wessinger, 98-1234 (La.5/28/99), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Narcisse La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. DHILLY 996 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4/12/05), ; see also State v. Sykes, XXXX-XXXX (La.