DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brown, 907 So. 2d 1.

222 citing documents.

  • State v. Hotard 994 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Adams 993 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4/12/05), , the Court set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Franklin 996 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), .
  • State v. Colbert 990 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Berry 989 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), (quotation omitted).
  • State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Collier 987 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    | sThe Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 2003-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Calvert 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. TROQUILLE 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
    The proper legal standard for determining whether a criminal defendant is competent to waive representation by counsel was set forth in State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX p. 28-29 (La.4/12/05), , 21-22: Both the Louisiana and federal constitutions guarantee a criminal defendant's right to the assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Bedou 985 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , the Court set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Clinton B. Schneider, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4/12/05), State v. Surratt, 05- 1406, (La.App.
  • State v. Schneider 981 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Brown, 03-897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), ; State v. Surratt, 05-1406 (La.App.
  • State v. Wright 978 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Also, State v. Brown , XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), .
  • State v. Mathieu 980 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating a claim of insufficient evidence in State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), p. 22, , 18: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kearney Alsandor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. P. T., Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. P.T. 970 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    In State v. Brown, 03-897, p. 28 (La.4/12/05), , cert.
  • State v. PT 970 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    In State v. Brown, 03-897, p. 28 (La.4/12/05), , cert.
  • State v. ALSANDOR 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. LaGarde 970 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, 03-897 (La.4/12/05)
  • State v. Martin 970 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    See, e.g., State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05)
  • State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), , rehearing granted in part on other grounds, 03-0897 (La.6/29/05).
  • State of Louisiana v. Ivory L. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4/12/05), rehearing granted in part on other grounds, 03-0897 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. James J. Francis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4/12/05), (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct.
  • State v. Francis 966 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, 03-897 (La.4/12/05), (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct.
  • State v. Wilson 965 So. 2d 992 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.04/12/05), .
  • State v. Ross 965 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Also State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), .
  • State v. Baker 962 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), ; State v. Seals, 95-0305 (La.11/25/96), , cert.
  • State v. Harrell 965 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the following standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Palmer 963 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    See also State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), .
  • State v. Mathieu 960 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, 03-897, p. 29 (La.4/12/05)
  • State v. Wilson 956 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), p. 22, , the Court set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Singleton 953 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4/12/05), )(alteration in original).
  • State of Louisiana v. Justin Charles Singleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4/12/05), )(alteration in original).
  • State v. Batiste 956 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    See, State v. Brown, 03-897 (La.4/12/05), .
  • State v. Washington 952 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    In State v. Brown, 2003-0897 (La.4/12/05), p. 22, , the Court set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: lfiWhen reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Washington 952 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), p. 22, , the Court set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Willard Brandenburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    4/12/05), -22: Both the Louisiana and federal constitutions guarantee a criminal defendant’s right to the assistance of counsel.
  • State v. Brandenburg 949 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    The Louisiana Supreme Court held in State v. Brown, 03-897, pp. 28-29 (La.4/12/05), , 21-22: Both the Louisiana and federal constitutions guarantee a criminal defendant's right to the assistance of counsel.
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Roberts 947 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    State v. Brown, 03-897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05), .
  • State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    In State v. Brown , XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), p. 22, , the Court set forth the standard for determining a claim of insufficiency of evidence: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate courts are controlled by the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Rideau 947 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    See, e.g., State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05)
  • State v. Godbolt 950 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), .
  • State v. Gauthier 941 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    See, e.g., State v. Brown, 03-0897, p. 22 (La.4/12/05)
  • State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    In State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/12/05), , the supreme court explained the test for the admission of a confession and the standard of review to be applied to the trial court's determination: As a general matter, before a confession may be admitted into evidence, the State has the burden of affirmatively showing that it was made freely and voluntarily and not
  • State v. Cambre 939 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    As provided by the Louisiana Supreme Court in the capital case of State v. Brown, 03-0897 (La.4/12/05), , "[a]lthough this Court has ruled that a defendant may `waive' his right to be present in a non-capital case, it has never ruled that a defendant in a capital case may absent himself during the key phases of the trial specified in La.
  • State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
    This court has held that, "`[w]hile an indigent defendant has a right to counsel as well as the opposite right to represent himself, he has no constitutional right to be both represented and representative.'" State v. Brown, XXXX-XXXX p. 29 (La.4/12/05)