Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Juniors, 915 So. 2d 291.

176 citing documents.

State v. Jenkins 91 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Juniors, 03-2425, pp. 60-61 (La.6/29/05), -35 , cert.
State v. Nelson 85 So. 3d 21 La. 2012
See, e.g.: U.S. v. Thompson, 528 F.3d 110, 115 (2nd Cir.2008); State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), ; State v. Breaux, 45,676 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Terry L. Clarkson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Clarkson 86 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See also State v. Juniors, 03-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Turner 82 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 54 (La.6/29/05), .
State v. Maxwell 83 So. 3d 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
at 4 [ ]; see also, State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 28 (La.6/29/05), .
State v. Robinson 79 So. 3d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Odenbaugh 82 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
at 4, 723 So.2d at 943 ; see also, State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 28 (La.6/29/05), .
State v. Victor 82 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“The trial court plays a unique role in the dynamics of a voir dire, for it is the court that observes firsthand the demeanor of the attorneys and venire persons, the nuances of questions asked the racial composition of the venire, and the general atmosphere of the voir dire that simply cannot be replicated from a cold transcript.” State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 32 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Russell 73 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See, e.g., State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), p. 60, .
State v. Green 62 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Juniors, 2003-2425, p. 54 (La.6/29/05), .
State Farm Mutual Automobile ins.co. A/S/O Jason J. Lopez v. Dustin P. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
(citing State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p.47 (La.6/29/05), ).
State v. Andrews 61 So. 3d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
[[Image here]] (4) The juror will not accept the law as given to him by the court; The Louisiana Supreme Court summarized the applicable law in State v. Juniors, 03-2425, pp. 7-9 (La.6/29/05), -305 , as follows: Louisiana Constitution article I, § 17 guarantees to a defendant the right to full voir dire examination of prospective jurors and to challenge jurors peremptorily.
State v. White 57 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.06/29/05), , cert.
Freeport-McMoran Energy, LLC v. Cedyco Corp. 54 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
(citing State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 47 (La.6/29/05), ).
State of Louisiana v. David G. Sarpy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
at 4; see also, State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 28 (La.6/29/05)
State v. Sarpy 52 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
at 4, ; see also, State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 28 (La.6/29/05), .
State v. Breaux 55 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Horn 55 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Batson v. Kentucky, supra; see also State v. Juniors, 03-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Bess 47 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See also State v. Juniors, 03-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
Brooks v. Reimonenq 44 So. 3d 824 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
(citing State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p.47 (La.6/29/05), ).
State v. Burton 43 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Juniors, 2003-2425, pp. 7-9 (La.6/29/05), -305 , the court stated: Louisiana Constitution article I, § 17 guarantees to a defendant the right to full voir dire examination of prospective jurors and to challenge jurors peremptorily.
State v. Kelson 40 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Lindsey, 2006-0255 (La.1/17/07), ; State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), .
State v. Knight 34 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See also, State v. Juniors, 03-2425 (La.6/29/05), -30 , cert.
Donald R. Alexander v. Ira M. Tate La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Alexander v. Tate 30 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Juniors, 03-2425 *1129 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
Finch v. ATC/Vancom Management Services Ltd. Partnership 33 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), .
State of Louisiana v. Joseph T. Plauche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
at 4; see also, State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 28 (La.6/29/05)
State v. Plauche 32 So. 3d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
at 4, 723 So.2d at 943 ; see also, State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 28 (La.6/29/05), .
State v. Farinas 28 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Juniors, 03-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Nelson 25 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
In State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Anderson 28 So. 3d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Juniors, 03-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Courtney Paul Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Savoy 11 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 607(D)(2) — that its probative value is “substantially outweighed by the risks of undue consumption of time, confusion of the issues, or unfair prejudice.” State v. Juniors, 03-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Robinson 11 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Juniors, 03-2425, pp. 7-9 (La.6/29/05), -305 , the Court stated: Louisiana Constitution article I, § 17 guarantees to a defendant the right to full voir dire examination of prospective jurors and to challenge jurors peremptorily.
State v. Reeves 11 So. 3d 1031 La. 2009
3 Cir. 10/5/94) , , writ denied, 1994-2712 (La.6/30/95), ; State v. Cross, 1993-1189 (La.6/30/95), , overruling recognized in State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Thomas 7 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
1727 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006); State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Jacobs 6 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
at 4[, 723 So.2d at 942 ]; see also, State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 28 (La.6/29/05), .
State v. Johnson 3 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
ongful denial of a challenge for cause on appeal if he has used all of his peremptory challenges and the trial court’s error in denying a challenge for cause “that results in depriving him of one of his peremptory challenges constitutes a substantial violation of his constitutional and statutory rights, requiring reversal of the conviction and sentence.” State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.06/29/05), .
State v. Sartain 2 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In so finding, this court discussed other cases: In State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), , the defendant was charged with killing one man and wounding another at a business.
Wyatt v. Hendrix 998 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert denied, 547 U.S. 1115 , 126 S.Ct.
State v. Daigle 994 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Bradley 997 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1283 , 18 L.Ed.2d 241 (1967); State v. Juniors, 2003-2425 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
at 4; see also, State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 28 (La.6/29/05), .
State v. Hebert 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. FBA 983 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The supreme court in State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 11 (La.6/29/05), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. F.B.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. F.B.A. 983 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
The supreme court in State v. Juniors, 03-2425, p. 11 (La.6/29/05), , cert, de *1017 nied, 547 U.S. 1115 , 126 S.Ct.
State v. Juniors 971 So. 2d 1045 La. 2008
The district court is further ordered to conduct a hearing immediately with the Louisiana Indigent Defense Assistance Board for the purpose of appointment of counsel as directed by the Court in State v. Juniors, 03-2425 (La.6/29/05), .
State in the Interest of C.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007