DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Touchet, 897 So. 2d 900.

54 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Kineric Oneal Curry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Freddy Lee Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), and State v. Helou, 02- 2302 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Clyde Santon Disedare, Jr. -Aka- Clyde Santon Disedare La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), wherein this court stated: In order for this court to uphold a conviction of false imprisonment while armed with a dangerous weapon, La.R.S.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Fisher La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Tracy Harris, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), (citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald Brent Debarge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Diondre D. Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. M.S. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), -904, in which this court explained: After refusing once or twice, the victim removed her own clothing at the Defendant’s prompting.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Kivin Nixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • Distinguished State v. Minor 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 3/9/05) , , the injuries at issue were bruises.
  • Distinguished State of Louisiana v. Regal Minor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), the injuries at issue were bruises.
  • State v. RT 999 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Tassin 997 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.
  • State in the Interest of D.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), stating: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. D.J. 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , stating: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State Ex Rel. Dj 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , stating: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court sets forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Jacobs 987 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court sets forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Samuel 984 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Herbert Lee Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Prejean 981 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.
  • State v. Smith 978 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , 902: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Ware 980 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Terry Howard Smith Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), : When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Ware La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Clarence Walker Nelson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Nelson 977 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. George Commeta Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), the defendant was convicted of aggravated rape.
  • State v. Jaramillo 953 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Jaramillo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Willard Brandenburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), (citing State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Brandenburg 949 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), (citing State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Roland A. Authement, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court opined: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Authement 950 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court opined: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Warren Todd Dossman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), (quoting State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Sean A. Strange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Dossman 940 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), (quoting State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Strange 940 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Touchet 931 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Touchet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Dallas D. Durgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), (quoting State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Durgan 931 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), ( quoting State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. J.F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. J.F. 927 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Boyance 924 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), , this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Parnell Poche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), (quoting State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad Paul Boyance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/9/05), this court stated: With regard to sufficiency of the evidence, this court set forth as follows in State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Poche 924 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir. 3/9/05), (quoting State v. Lambert, 97-64, pp. 4-5 (La.App.