Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carter v. Haygood, 892 So. 2d 1261.
-
Peters v. Layrisson
961 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
-
Mallett v. McNeal
939 So. 2d 1254
La. 2006
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), .
-
London Towne Condo. Ass'n v. LONDON TOWNE
939 So. 2d 1227
La. 2006
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
- Wayne Watkins v. St. Martin Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Watkins v. ST. MARTIN PARISH SCHOOL BD.
929 So. 2d 846
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, pp. 11-12 (La.1/19/05), .
-
Vincent Alexander v. Amelia Manor Nursing Home, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1/19/05), citing Stobart v. State, Through DOTD
-
Pauline Mitchell v. Father Robert Limoges
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Evans, we noted that the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, pp. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), has recently stated: Ordinarily, the exceptor bears the burden of proof at the trial of the peremptory exception.
-
Mitchell v. Limoges
923 So. 2d 906
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Evans, we noted that the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, pp. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), , has recently stated: Ordinarily, the exceptor bears the burden of proof at the trial of the peremptory exception.
-
Alexander v. AMELIA MANOR NURSING HOME
924 So. 2d 409
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), , citing Stobart v. State, Through DOTD
-
Babineaux v. DOTD
927 So. 2d 1121
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
-
Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, Inc.
917 So. 2d 424
La. 2005
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), ; Perez v. Trahant, 2000-2372 (La.App.
-
Kirby v. Field
923 So. 2d 131
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), .
-
Parish Nat. Bank v. Wilks
923 So. 2d 8
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .
-
In Re Noe
916 So. 2d 1138
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Upon review by the Supreme Court this matter *1140 was remanded for a
-
In Re Evans
906 So. 2d 683
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, pp. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), .
- In Re: Ella Evans La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
In re Medical Review Proceeding of Sitzman
904 So. 2d 754
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Brenda Sue Carter v. Gary Stephen Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
-
In re Medical Review Panel Proceedings In re Noe
898 So. 2d 1289
La. 2005
Granted; the court of appeal’s ruling is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider the prescrip *1290 tion issue (1) in light of this Court s involving the application of the third category of contra non valen-tem, and (2) applying the correct date of March 27, 2002 as the date Ms. Noe visited Dr. Frank Wharton.
-
In Re Medical Review Panel Proceedings
898 So. 2d 1289
La. 2005
Granted; the court of appeal's ruling is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider the prescription *1290 issue (1) involving the application of the third category of contra non valentem, and (2) applying the correct date of March 27, 2002 as the date Ms. Noe visited Dr. Frank Wharton.
-
Alexander v. Fulco
895 So. 2d 668
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .