Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carter v. Haygood, 892 So. 2d 1261.

270 citing documents.

  • Peters v. Layrisson 961 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Mallett v. McNeal 939 So. 2d 1254 La. 2006
    Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), .
  • London Towne Condo. Ass'n v. LONDON TOWNE 939 So. 2d 1227 La. 2006
    Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Wayne Watkins v. St. Martin Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • Watkins v. ST. MARTIN PARISH SCHOOL BD. 929 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, pp. 11-12 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Vincent Alexander v. Amelia Manor Nursing Home, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    1/19/05), citing Stobart v. State, Through DOTD
  • Pauline Mitchell v. Father Robert Limoges La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In Evans, we noted that the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, pp. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), has recently stated: Ordinarily, the exceptor bears the burden of proof at the trial of the peremptory exception.
  • Mitchell v. Limoges 923 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In Evans, we noted that the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Carter v. Haygood, 04-646, pp. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), , has recently stated: Ordinarily, the exceptor bears the burden of proof at the trial of the peremptory exception.
  • Alexander v. AMELIA MANOR NURSING HOME 924 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), , citing Stobart v. State, Through DOTD
  • Babineaux v. DOTD 927 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 917 So. 2d 424 La. 2005
    Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), ; Perez v. Trahant, 2000-2372 (La.App.
  • Kirby v. Field 923 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Parish Nat. Bank v. Wilks 923 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .
  • In Re Noe 916 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Upon review by the Supreme Court this matter *1140 was remanded for a
  • In Re Evans 906 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, pp. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), .
  • In Re: Ella Evans La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • In re Medical Review Proceeding of Sitzman 904 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Brenda Sue Carter v. Gary Stephen Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
  • In re Medical Review Panel Proceedings In re Noe 898 So. 2d 1289 La. 2005
    Granted; the court of appeal’s ruling is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider the prescrip *1290 tion issue (1) in light of this Court s involving the application of the third category of contra non valen-tem, and (2) applying the correct date of March 27, 2002 as the date Ms. Noe visited Dr. Frank Wharton.
  • In Re Medical Review Panel Proceedings 898 So. 2d 1289 La. 2005
    Granted; the court of appeal's ruling is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider the prescription *1290 issue (1) involving the application of the third category of contra non valentem, and (2) applying the correct date of March 27, 2002 as the date Ms. Noe visited Dr. Frank Wharton.
  • Alexander v. Fulco 895 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .