Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Carter v. Haygood, 892 So. 2d 1261.

270 citing documents.

Davis v. Johnson 36 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Munro v. LOUISIANA HOTELIERS, LLC 37 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Slaughter v. NORTH OAKS MEDICAL CENTER 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Sperandeo v. OSABAS 33 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
art. 927(B); Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
In Re Medical Review Panel Proceedings of Berry 30 So. 3d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
” Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), .
Titus v. IHOP RESTAURANT, INC. 25 So. 3d 761 La. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), .
NORDIC KITCHENS & BATH, INC. v. Ludlow 27 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Stubblefield v. LINDIG 17 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Fred's, Inc. 18 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
art. 927(B); Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), ; Holmes v. LSU/E. A. Conway Medical Center, 43,662 (La.App.
McKinley v. Scott 17 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Heirs of Jackson v. O'Donovan 12 So. 3d 435 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646, p. 8-9 (La.1/19/05), ; Campo v. Correa, 2001-2707, p. 7 (La.6/21/07), .
Williams v. Damico 9 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Benoit v. Wooderson 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Eric Ryan Wimberly, Et Ux. v. James Orville Blue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Natasha Simona A. Benoit v. James Michael Wooderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05)
Wimberly v. Blue 11 So. 3d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
LaFleur v. Blue 6 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 04-646 (La.1/19/05), ; Stevens v. Bruce, 04-133 (La.App.
Gallant Investments, Ltd. v. Illinois Central Railroad 7 So. 3d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
Kampmann v. Mason 7 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Carter v. Haygood, 2004-0646, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), .
Bridges v. Mosaic Global Holdings, Inc. 23 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
RAMELLI GROUP v. City of New Orleans 997 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Holmes v. LSU/EA Conway Medical Center 997 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
art. 927(B); Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), ; Campo v. Correa, supra .
McGuire v. Mosley Rogers Title Co., LLC 997 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Ferguson v. Sugar 988 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
at p. 4, ; Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
Boquet Ex Rel. Billiot v. SWDI, LLC 992 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
Chisley v. Smith 986 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
*226 App.2d Cir.02/25/05), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.05/06/05), , citing Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX (La.01/19/05), .
Boykins v. Boykins 984 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Lee v. PROFESSIONAL CONST. SERVICES, INC. 982 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), (citation omitted).
Fountain v. LaVigne 980 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), .
Bridges v. HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORPORATION 977 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Haynes v. Hunter 973 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
May Yen v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1/19/05), (citation omitted).
Yen v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury 971 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), (citation omitted).
Whitten v. Moorman 973 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .
DOMINION EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION v. Waters 972 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
See also Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), .
OIL INS. LTD. v. Dow Chemical Co. 977 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), ; Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Edwards v. Alexander 960 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .
In Re Noe 958 So. 2d 617 La. 2007
This court granted Ms. Noe's application for writ of certiorari, vacated the ruling of the court of appeal and remanded the case to the court of appeal to reconsider the prescription issue in light of this court's recent decision in Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), , involving the third category of contra non valentem.
Ford v. RAPIDES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, LLC 957 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Survival Action The supreme court in Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 9 (La.1/19/05), (citations omitted), recently summarized the law pertaining to prescriptive periods surrounding medical malpractice actions: [I]f prescription is evident on the face of the pleadings, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show the action has not prescribed.
Kenneth Ford v. Rapides Healthcare System, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1/19/05), (citations omitted), recently summarized the law pertaining to prescriptive periods surrounding medical malpractice actions: [I]f prescription is evident on the face of the pleadings, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show the action has not prescribed.
Fishbein v. State 960 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, pp. 10-11 (La.1/19/05), .
LaCombe v. Bank One Corp. 953 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
The most recent detailed discussion of the doctrine of contra non valentem by the Louisiana Supreme Court can be found in Carter v. Haygood, 04-646 (La.1/19/05), wherein the court stated the following: At the outset, we observe that prescriptive statutes are strictly construed against prescription and in favor of the obligation sought to be extinguished; thus, of two possible constructions, that which favors maintaining, as opposed to barring, an action should be adopted.
Dr. Rick Lacombe v. Bank One Corp. D/B/A Bank One La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1/19/05), wherein the court stated the following: 8 At the outset, we observe that prescriptive statutes are strictly 9 construed against prescription and in favor of the obligation sought to 10 be extinguished; thus, of two possible constructions, that which favors 11 maintaining, as o
Pratt v. STATE MEDICAL CENTER IN SHREVEPORT 953 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Carter v. Haygood, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .
Gambel v. U-PARK SYSTEMS OF LOUISIANA, INC. 952 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), .
Alphonse Williams v. Pioneer Fishing & Rental Tools, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 4 (La.1/19/05)
Williams v. PIONEER FISHING & RENTAL TOOLS 945 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), .
Hanks v. Entergy Corp. 944 So. 2d 564 La. 2006
1/19/05), ; Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882 .
Brenda Frank v. Piggly Wiggly Company Stores La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1/19/05), (citing Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, ).