DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite TERREBONNE SCHOOL BD. v. Castex Energy, 893 So. 2d 789.

25 citing documents.

  • James Self Wilma Self v. Bpx Operating Company La. 2024
  • State of Louisiana v. Cruz Matute La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
    1/19/05), (“[S]tatements contained in the official comments are not part of the statute, and are not binding on this court .
  • State Of Louisiana, Et Al. v. Louisiana Land & La. 2022
    1/19/05), (rejecting the argument that an implied obligation gives the landowner more than restoration to property’s pre -lease condition, minus wear and tear.)
  • Morgan City Land and Fur Company, L.L.C. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    1/19/05), as establishing it is improper to impose a duty to maintain here.
  • Vincent Fertitta v. Regions Bank La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
  • Joseph Kolwe, Jr. v. Civil and Structural Engineers,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • Kolwe v. Civil & Structural Eng'rs, Inc. 264 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • Grace Ranch, LLC v. Bp America Production Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • Grace Ranch, LLC v. BP Am. Prod. Co. 252 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. the Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    1/19/05), ], and it certainly exists under the Civil Code.
  • State v. La. Land & Exploration Co. 241 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    1/19/05), ], and it certainly exists under the Civil Code.
  • McGee v. Denham Holdings, L.L.C. 214 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Scarberry v. Entergy Corp. 172 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    v. Castex Energy, Inc., 04-9608, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), .
  • State v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. 110 So. 3d 1038 La. 2013
    v. Castex Energy, Inc., 2004-0968, p. 10 (La.1/9/05); , this court noted the text of La.
  • Sims v. American Insurance Co. 101 So. 3d 1 La. 2012
    v. Castex Energy, Inc., 04-968 (La.1/19/05), .
  • Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 48 So. 3d 234 La. 2010
    v. Castex Energy, Inc., 04-0968 (La.1/19/05), , wherein this Court held that “in the absence of an express lease provision, Mineral Code article 122 does not impose an implied duty to restore the surface to its original, pre-lease condition absent proof that the lessee has exercised his rights under the lease unreasonably or excessively.” 19 In Castex, the l
  • Broussard v. Hilcorp Energy Co. 24 So. 3d 813 La. 2009
    31:122 and Terrebonne Parish School Board v. Castex Entergy, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.1/9/05), .
  • State v. Gutweiler 979 So. 2d 469 La. 2008
    v. Castex Energy, Inc., 04-968, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), ; -57 (La.1982).
  • LEJEUNE BROS. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co. 981 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Lejeune Brothers further argued that they acquired the right to sue in contract because of the implied obligation to restore the property to its original pre-lease condition that is inherent in all mineral leases, citing Terrebonne Parish School Board v. Castex Energy, Inc., -792 , XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), Mineral Code Article 122, LSA-R.S.
  • FNB OF PICAYUNE v. Pearl River Fabricators 971 So. 2d 302 La. 2007
    v. Castex Energy, Inc., 04-0968 (La.1/19/05), ; see also Willis-Knighton Medical Center v. Caddo Shreveport Sales and Use Tax Com'n, 04-0473 (La.4/1/05), .
  • Phoenix Associates v. EH Mitchell & Co. 970 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Terrebonne Parish School Board v. Castex Energy, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), , (quoting Caskey v. Kelly Oil Company, 98-1193 p. 8 (La.6/29/99) )
  • Daniel A. Hardee, III v. Atlantic Richfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    1/19/05), (quoting Corbello, 850 So.2d at 694), by explaining that the Corbello decision “involved an express lease provision obligating the lessee, upon termination of the lease, to ‘reasonably restore the premises as nearly as possible to their [condition at the beginning of the lease].’” In other words, the Corbello
  • Hardee v. Atlantic Richfield 926 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    In doing so, this court noted that the language cited above from Corbello was dicta and further noted that the supreme court clarified that statement in Terrebonne Parish School Board v. Castex Energy, Inc., 04-968, p. 13 (La.1/19/05), (quoting Corbello, 850 So.2d at 694 ), by explaining that the Corbello decision "involved an express lease provision obligating the lessee, upon termination of the lease, to `reasonably restore the premises as nearly as possible to their [condition at the beginnin
  • Dore Energy Corporation v. Carter-Langham, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    1/19/05), : This court’s recent decision in Corbello, 850 So.2d at 694, also involved an express lease provision obligating the lessee, upon termination of the lease, to “reasonably restore the premises as nearly as possible to their present condition.” The court emphasized that the lease
  • Dore Energy Corp. v. Carter-Langham, Inc. 901 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Furthermore, as the supreme court pointed out in Corbello and in its recent decision in Terrebonne Parish School Board v. Castex Energy, Inc., 04-968, p. 13 (La.1/19/05), , 798: This court's recent decision in Corbello, 850 So.2d at 694 , also involved an express lease provision obligating the lessee, upon termination of the lease, to "reasonably restore the premises as nearly as possible to their present condition."