Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 908 So. 2d 1.
-
Bienville Parish School Board v. Thrash Construction Services, LLC, American Testing Lab, LLC, Yeager, Watson & Associates, Inc., …
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
6/29/05), Iberia Bank v. Dalton Const. LLC, 52,752 (La.
- J. Caldarera & Company, Inc. Versus Triumph Construction Company, LLC. and Atain Specialty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
-
Gabriel Lagrange v. Harley E. Boone
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Corp., 04–2804, 04–2857 (La.6/29/05)
- Paul Johnson v. Shannon Iverson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- Patriot Construction & Industrial,llc v. Buquet & Leblanc, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
- Michelle Rung v. Deondrick Bessard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
- Emile, Michele, Brittany and Cecilia Chacon Versus Regal Remodelers, L.L.C., Tanweer Bhatti, Aix Specialty Insurance Company, State Farm … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- Michael D'Aquin Versus Garcia Roofing Replacement, LLC La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
-
James F. Kowski Versus Five Properties, L.L.C. and Apmt Management Services, L.L.C. D/B/A Tonti Management
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
6/29/05), the positive law of Louisiana favors arbitration.
- R & E Petroleum, LLC, Ragheb Chaar, & Elsie Aradi Versus Lkm Convenience, LLC & Toan Hyunh La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
- Jessica Hope Browne v. Gordon McKernan Injury Attorneys, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
-
Springbok Royalty Partners, LLC v. Ralph and Sheryl Cook
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
6/29/05), Hanlon v. Monsanto Ag Products, LLC, 48,010 (La.
-
Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co., LLC v. Florida Gas Transmission Company LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
6/29/05), our supreme court recognized that Louisiana favors arbitration, and any doubt concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration: [W]e hold that a presumption of arbitrability does exist.
- Jon Hart v. Ronnie Mabou La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- Ameriprint, LLC Versus Canon Financial Services, Inc. Canon Solutions America, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
- Ameriprint, LLC Versus Canon Solutions America, Inc.; Canon Financial Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
- Community Development Capital v. Housing Corporation of America, Gregory Swafford, and Vanessa Marie Caliste Swafford and Holding Renaissance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
- Martin Baack and Brenda Baack v. Michael McIntosh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
- Erg Enterprises, LLC v. Green Coast Enterprises, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
- Kenneth H. Hooks, III and Lindi Hooks v. Berkshire Hathaway Automotive d/b/a Vandergriff Acura La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
-
Wieland v. Shreveport Aquarium, LLC
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
6/29/05), Lincoln Builders, Inc. v. Raintree Inv.
- Carl C. Brown, Jr. v. Kabco Builders, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
- Brown v. Kabco Builders, Inc. 274 So. 3d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
Stemcor USA Incorporated v. Cia Siderurgica Do Para Cosipar
La. 2019
6/29/05), (“At the outset, we note the positive law of Louisiana favors arbitration.”) Finally, we point out the history of the attachment remedy in Louisiana generally reflects legislative expansion over time.
-
Traders' Mart, Inc. v. AOS, Inc.
268 So. 3d 420
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
6/29/05), ; Duhon v. Activelaf, LLC , supra .
-
Fla. Gas Transmission Co. v. Tex. Brine Co.
267 So. 3d 633
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/29/05), , 8 ; see also Astro Technology, Inc. v. D.H.
- Whitney Bank v. Garden Gate New Orleans, L.L.C. 236 So. 3d 774 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- Gardiner Farms, LLC v. Advanced Agriculture, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Gardiner Farms, LLC v. Advanced Agric., Inc. 258 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Daniels v. Int'l Paper Co.
245 So. 3d 180
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
6/29/05), , the supreme court cited Professor Saul Litvinoff's Consent Revisited: Offer Acceptance Option Right of First Refusal and Contracts of Adhesion in the Revision of the La.
- Doris H. Usie v. Sunshine Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
- Usie v. Sunshine Homes, Inc. 222 So. 3d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-
Swaggart v. Doe
216 So. 3d 1118
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
6/29/05), ; Lincoln Builders, Inc. v. Raintree Inv.
-
Potier v. Morris Bart, L.L.C.
214 So. 3d 116
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
6/29/05), , 7 interpreted La.
-
James Duhon v. Activelaf, LLC, D/B/A Skyzone Lafayette and Underwriters at Lloyds, London
La. 2016
6/29/05), and the Third Circuit’s opinion in Sutton Steel & Supply, Inc. v. Bellsouth Mobility, Inc., 07-146 (La.
-
Fluid Disposal Specialties, Inc. v. UniFirst Corp.
186 So. 3d 210
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Corp., 2004-2804 (La.6/29/05), ; Broussard v. CompuLink Bus.
-
Delta Administrative Services, L.L.C. v. Limousine Livery, Ltd.
216 So. 3d 906
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
ARBITRATION In Louisiana, the positive law favors arbitration as “a preferred method of alternative dispute resolution.” Hodges v. Reasonover, 12-0043, p. 4 (La.7/2/12), (citing Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, p. 6 (La.6/29/05), ).
-
Sanctuary Capital, LLC v. Cloud
163 So. 3d 890
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Corp., 2004-2804 (La.6/29/05), .
-
Facundus v. Baton Rouge General Medical Center
152 So. 3d 185
La. 2014
See Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), ; see also Coleman v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc., 08-1221 (La.3/17/09), .
-
Williams v. Keller Williams Realty, 1-800-351-5111, L.L.C.
154 So. 3d 605
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Often in small print, these contracts sometimes raise a question as to whether or not the weaker party actually consented to the terms.” Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 2004-2804, 2004-2857, p. 9 (La.6/29/05), -9 (citing Golz v. Children’s Bureau of N.O., )..
-
University of Louisiana Monroe Facilities, Inc. v. JPI Apartment Development, L.P.
151 So. 3d 126
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Corp., 2004-2804 (La.6/29/04), .
-
Pannagl v. Kelly
142 So. 3d 70
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, 2857 (La.6/29/05), .
-
Goodrich Petroleum Co. v. MRC Energy Co.
137 So. 3d 200
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Aguillard v. Auction |10 Management Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857, p. *206 8 (La.6/29/05), ; and Bolden v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 10-940, p. 11 (La.App.
-
G.A. Lotz Co. v. Alack
140 So. 3d 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857 (La.6/29/05), .
-
Hanlon v. Monsanto Ag Products, LLC
124 So. 3d 535
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Opposing the exception of prematurity and motion to stay, the plaintiffs argued *539 that the arbitration provision is unenforceable because it is a contract of adhesion to which they did not consent and that it is unconscionable under the factors set forth in Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 2004-2804 (La.6/29/05), .
-
Henderson v. Windrush Operating Co., L.L.C.
128 So. 3d 283
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co., 2012-2292 (La.6/28/13), - So.3d-, 2013 WL 3752474 ; Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 2004-2804, 2004-2857 (La.6/29/05), .
-
Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co.
144 So. 3d 791
La. 2013
Corp., 04-2804, p. 22 (La.6/29/05), (“It is well settled that a party who signs a written instrument is presumed to know its contents and cannot avoid its obligations by contending that he did not read it, that he did not understand it, or that the other party failed to explain it to him”).
-
Aeneas Williams Imports, L.L.C. v. Carter
131 So. 3d 894
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
-2804 (La.6/29/05) the Louisiana Supreme Court explained: Accordingly, even when the scope of an arbitration clause is fairly debatable or reasonably in doubt, the court should decide the question of construction in favor of arbitration.
-
Explained
Morial v. BPI Home Builder, LLC
99 So. 3d 1006
La. 2012
In Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 at p. 25 (La.6/29/05), , we explained Louisiana favors arbitration, and any doubt concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration: Even when the scope of an arbitration clause is fairly debatable or reasonably in doubt, the court should decide the question of construction in favor of arbitration.
-
Rain CII Carbon LLC v. ConocoPhillips Co.
105 So. 3d 757
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), .