Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 891 So. 2d 1250.

26 citing documents.

Gerald Williams v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections La. 2025
1/19/05), (statutory amendments requiring inmate to exhaust administrative remedies prior to bringing personal injury action could not be applied retroactively to deprive inmate of vested rights).
Cynthia Morales v. Alonzo Wilder Dr. Stephen McCulloh Cheryl Smith Lauren Milton Karlie Vikowski Other Unknown Livingston Parish … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Paulsell v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 112 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 04-0703, p. 15 (La.1/19/05), -60 ; compare Steeg, 329 So.2d at 722 ; Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Board , 39,149 at pp. 6-7, 891 So.2d at 89.
Larry Allen v. State of La, Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/19/05), the supreme court, in addressing whether the provisions of Act 89 applied retroactively to an inmate’s negligence action, stated that “[DPSC] has instituted a two-step system of review to address inmates’ formal grievances.
Allen v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 107 So. 3d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Servs., 04-703, p. 10 (La.1/19/05), , the supreme court, in addressing whether the provisions of Act 89 applied retroactively to an inmate’s negligence action, stated that "[DPSC] has instituted a two-step system of review to address inmates’ formal grievances.
Rainey Wallace v. the Geo Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/19/05), and Dailey, at 1108 (both of which were rendered on the same day) the court stated: The objection contemplates that the plaintiff has filed his action prior to some procedure or assigned time, and it is usually utilized in cases wherein
Wallace v. Geo Group, Inc. 84 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1 Cir. 2/23/04), , aff'd, 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), , and Dailey, 872 So.2d at 1108 (both of which were rendered on the same day) the court stated: The objection contemplates that the plaintiff has filed his action prior to some procedure or assigned time, and it is usually utilized in cases wherein the applicable law or contract has provided a procedure for one aggrie
State Ex Rel. Ac v. Md 70 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 04-0703, p. 12 (La.1/19/05), .
Rhone v. Ward 31 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Subsequently, the Supreme Court granted Rhone’s writ application and remanded the matter to this court “to reconsider the retroactivity issue in light of Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 2004-0703 (La.1/19/05), .” On remand, this court rejected Rhone’s argument that the application of the statute to his lawsuit was improper.
In Re Belle Co., LLC 978 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Flickinger v. Flickinger 952 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1 Cir. 2/23/04) , , writ granted 04-0703 (La.5/14/04), , affirmed 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANA 944 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.1/19/05), -58 .
Wilson v. Bordelon 926 So. 2d 529 La. 2006
Grant and remand to the court of appeal for reconsideration of the retroactivity issue in light of Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Rhone v. Ward 926 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
STEWART, J. The Louisiana Supreme Court remanded this matter to us for reconsideration in light of Cheron v. LCS Correctional Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Gray v. State 923 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), , the issue arose as to whether Cheron was required to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to asserting his tort claim.
Henry Gray v. State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Cheron v. LCS Correctional Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), the issue arose as to whether Cheron was required to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to asserting his tort claim.
Davis v. ST. FRANCISVILLE COUNTRY MANOR 928 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1st Cir.2/23/04), , aff'd, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .
Rhone v. Ward 920 So. 2d 217 La. 2006
Granted and remanded to court of appeal to reconsider the retroactivity issue in light of Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Peterson v. Gildon 917 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
*1286 On Remand BROWN, C.J. The Louisiana Supreme Court has ordered this court to consider these two writ applications by Kevin Peterson in light of Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Vincent v. Creed 917 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
BROWN, C.J. The Louisiana Supreme Court has ordered this court to consider this writ application in light of Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Manuel v. Stalder 928 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, *29 Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Vincent v. Creed 903 So. 2d 439 La. 2005
*440 Granted and remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider in light of Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Peterson v. Clason 902 So. 2d 1027 La. 2005
Granted and remanded to court of appeal to consider in light of Cheron v. LCS Correctional Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Peterson v. Hanson 902 So. 2d 1027 La. 2005
Granted and remanded to court of appeal to consider in light of Cheron v. v. LCS Correctional Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Boykin v. La. Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections 896 So. 2d 1023 La. 2005
Correctional Services, Inc., 04-0703 (La.1/19/05), .
Dailey v. Travis 892 So. 2d 17 La. 2005
For the reasons enunciated in the matter entitled Cheron v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc., 04-CC-0703, (La.1/19/05), , 2005 WL 106588 , we hold that the amendments to LSA-R.S.