DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 907 So. 2d 723.

38 citing documents.

  • Bobbi Harrigan O/B/O Matthew Surgenor, Robert Surgenor, and Cathy Surgenor v. Dr. William Risher and University Medical Center … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
  • Sue Perry, Et Ux Versus Employers Insurance of Wausau La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
  • Erica Kennedy Personally and on Behalf of Minor Child, Kenyale Simpson v. Morehouse Parish School Board an Incorporated … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • Kenneth Robinson and Youakisha Robinson Personally and on Behalf of Minor Child, Amarjai White v. Morehouse Parish School … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • State of Louisiana v. Davieontray Lee Breaux La. 2025
  • Thomas Anderson v. City of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
    6/29/05), -30 (wherein the Supreme Court stated a motion for involuntary dismissal is the procedural device for a party to seek dismissal of the claims against it).
  • Chloe Brubaker v. Houma Police Department, Chief of Police Travis Theriot, and Former Chief of Police Dana Coleman La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    6/ 29/ 05), ( quoting Maraist, Frank L. and Lemmon, Harry T., Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Vol.
  • Nicholas Boatwright v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • Amy Wederstrandt And Billy R. Efferson, Jr. v. Eden Kol La. 2023
    2d 545, 599, citing Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 6 (La.6/29/05); (citing State Through Dep't of Public Safety & Corrs., Office of State Police, Riverboat Gaming Div. v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Comm'n & Horseshoe Entm’t, 94-1872, p. 17 (La.5/22/95); 655 So.
  • Ashley N. Miller and Drusilla Parker v. Joseph P. Hirstius and American Alternative Insurance Corporation La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
    6/ 29/ 05), ("[ Tlhe mere act of filing an answer and participating in discovery does not constitute an express written waiver of citation and service as contemplated by La.
  • Home Bank, N. A. v. Golden La Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    6/29/05), (citing Maraist, Frank L. and Lemmon, Harry T., Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Vol.
  • Shane Salathe Versus The Parish of Jefferson Through the Department of Sewerage La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
    See Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04–2893 (La.6/29/05), (where two statutes deal with the same subject matter, they should be harmonized if possible; however, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character); Don Bihm Equipment Co., Inc. v. Lo
  • Jeff Mercer, L.L.C. v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 174 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 2004-2893 (La.6/29/05), (where two statutes deal with the same subject matter, they should be harmonized if possible; however, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character); Don Bihm Equipment Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Dept. of Transp.
  • Davis v. Caraway 164 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In interpreting statutes, “where two statutes deal with the same subject matter, they should be harmonized if possible; however, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.” Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893 (La.6/29/05); .
  • Alton Leon Fields, Sr. v. Lafayette Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    6/29/05), which found, “ the mere act of filing an answer and participating in discovery does not constitute an express written waiver of citation and service as contemplated by La.
  • Jackson v. City of New Orleans 144 So. 3d 876 La. 2014
    10/16/07), -59 ; Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 2004-2893 (La.6/29/05), ; State Through Department of Public Safety and Conections, Office of State Police, Riverboat Gaming Division v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission, 94-1872 (La.5/22/95), .
  • Davis v. State Board of Certified Public Accountants 131 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
    See Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 6 (La.6/29/05), (“[Wjhen the legislature specifically enumerates a series of things, the legislature’s omission of other items, which could have been easily included in the statute is deemed intentional.”).
  • Davis v. Caraway 113 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    We are aware of Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893 (La.6/29/05), , holding that the versions of La.
  • Waste Management of Louisiana, L.L.C. v. Consolidated Garbage District No. 1 of the Parish of Jefferson 113 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    eme Court has held that “[pjursuant to general rules of statutory construction, ‘where two statutes deal with |10the same subject matter, they should be harmonized if possible; however, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.’ ” Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 4 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Mason Godfrey v. Paul Reggie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    6/29/05), which held that ―[w]here the objection is based on service outside the 90-day time limit of La.
  • Godfrey v. Reggie 94 So. 3d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    We acknowledge the supreme court’s opinion in Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 4 (La.6/29/05), , which held that "[w]here the objection is based on service outside the 90-day time limit of La.
  • Burge v. State 43 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Cf. Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893 (La.6/29/05), -730 , which was decided prior to the Legislature’s 2006 amendment of LSA-C.C.P.
  • Dalke v. ARMANTONO 40 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    1st Cir.6/6/08), , 526, unit not considered, OS-1557 (La.10/10/08), ; but see Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, pp. 3-4 (La.6/29/05), -27 (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court | inexplained that the proper manner of objecting to an action based on failure to effect service within the 90-day time limit of Article 1201(C) is by filing a motion for involuntary dismissal pursuant to La.
  • Wilbert Curry v. Javell McGinnis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    6/29/05), to be pertinent and much more instructive.
  • Curry v. McGinnis 3 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    We find Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893 (La.6/29/05), , to be pertinent and much more instructive.
  • Tranchant v. State 978 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 4 (La.6/29/05), .
  • TRANSCHANT v. State 978 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 4 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Thomas v. LABICHE 976 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Plaintiffs rely upon Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893 (La.6/29/05), .
  • INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., INC. v. Hilton 966 So. 2d 545 La. 2007
    Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 6 (La.6/29/05); (citing State Through Dep't of Public Safety & Corrs., Office of State Police, Riverboat Gaming Div. v. Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Comm'n & Horseshoe Entm't, 94-1872, p. 17 (La.5/22/95); (citing State ex rel.
  • Matthews v. City of Bossier City 963 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    See Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893 (La.06/29/05), , in which the supreme court distinguished the motion for involuntary dismissal under La.
  • Ridgeway v. Pierre 950 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    *889 State Farm and Mr. Pierre contend that Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 2004-2893, (La.06/29/95), , is controlling in this matter.
  • Thorning v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 934 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    In Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 4 (La.6/29/05), -727 , the supreme court examined the requirement to request service within ninety days in detail.
  • Thorning v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 934 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    In Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 4 (La.6/29/05), -727 , the supreme court examined the requirement to request service within ninety days in detail.
  • Roberts v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    onstruction are well settled: "Pursuant to general rules of statutory construction, `where two statutes deal with the same subject matter, they should be harmonized if possible; however, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.'" Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 4 (La.6/29/05), (quoting City of Pineville v. Am.
  • Albert L. Roberts, Jr., Et Ux. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    6/29/05), (quoting City of Pineville v. Am.
  • Richie, Richie & Oberle, L.L.P. v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 928 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    2 Moreover, pursuant to general rules of statutory construction, “where two statutes deal with the same subject matter, they should be harmonized if possible; however, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.” Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893, p. 4 (La.6/29/05), (quoting City of Pineville v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3352, 00-198
  • Dufrene v. Carter 917 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893 (La.6/29/05), ; Bell v. Kreider, 03-300 (La.App.
  • Holden v. Knight 916 So. 2d 122 La. 2005
    Grant with order remanding to the court of appeal for reconsideration in light of Lea Sinclair Filson v. Windsor Court Hotel, 04-2893 (La.6/29/05), .