Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marshall, 943 So. 2d 362.

146 citing documents.

State v. Shelton 75 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State v. Moore 75 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Absent internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, a single witness’s testimony, if believed by the fact finder, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), ; see also State v. Robinson, 10-0885, pp. 7-8 (La.App.
State v. Fortenberry 73 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Ron Stewart Martin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Martin 66 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Credibility determinations are within the sound discretion of the trier of fact and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State v. Pleasant 66 So. 3d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Absent internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, a single witness’s testimony, if believed by the fact finder, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana v. R. K. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Brock Anthony Lafitte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Lafitte 63 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Credibility determinations are within the sound discretion of the trier of fact and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State v. R.K. 64 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Credibility determinations are within the sound discretion of the trier of fact and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Damien Orbro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. ORBRO 64 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Credibility determinations are within the sound discretion of the trier of fact and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Nicholas Courville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Robinson 54 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Davis 47 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Marshall, 2004-3139 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State v. Blow 46 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Marshall, 2004-3139 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State Ex Rel. Prr, Jr. 36 So. 3d 1138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
11/29/06), ; State In Int.
Austin v. Department of Police 36 So. 3d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Marshall, 2004-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06)
State of Louisiana v. Milton Anthony Wilks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Wilks 32 So. 3d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Marshall, 04-3139 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Knight 34 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Marshall, 04-3139 (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Kendrick Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Scott 26 So. 3d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
standard, which the reviewing court uses in determining whether there is sufficient evidence to convict a defendant, does not permit this court “to second guess the rational credibility determinations of the fact finder at trial” or | ¡/‘consider the rationality of the thought processes employed by a particular fact finder in reaching a verdict.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, pp. 5-6 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
Pearson v. Department of Police 26 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Marshall, 2004-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06)
State of Louisiana v. Daryl W. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson. 21 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State v. Johnson 22 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The fact finder’s discretion will be impinged upon “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental protection of due process of law.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 5 (La.11/29/06), , quoting Jackson, 443 U.S. at 319, 99 S.Ct.
State v. GRH 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. G. R. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Timothy Glen Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Granger 11 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
|8State v. Marshall, 04-3139, pp. 5-6 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State v. Lawrence 6 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Therefore, “absent internal contradiction or irreconcilable conflict with the physical evidence, a single witness’s testimony, if believed by the fact finder, is sufficient to support a factual conclusion.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Paul Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Jacobs 2 So. 3d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“Credibility determinations are within the sound discretion of the trier of fact and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the l7evidence.” State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. VanBuren 3 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Marshall, 04-3139 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State v. Butler 997 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Marshall, 04-3139, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), ; State v. Legrand, 02-1462, p. 5 (La.12/3/03), .
State of Louisiana v. Ezekiel Maurice McGinnis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. McGinnis 981 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Marshall, 04-3139 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Archie Louis Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Carter 981 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Marshall, 04-3139 (La.11/29/06), , cert.
State v. Ford 976 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Marshall, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/29/06), ; State v. Burd, 40,480 (La.
State v. Baker 962 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Marshall, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/29/06), ; State v. White, 28,095 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jeremy D. Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Lee 957 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Marshall, 04-3139, pp. 6-7 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Hailey 953 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Marshall, 04-3139 (La.11/29/06), .