Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Strange, 876 So. 2d 39.
-
State Of Louisiana v. Raymond L. Hart
La. 2025
5/14/04), following a legal initial traffic stop, there is nothing that precludes an officer from engaging the defendant in conversation and asking for defendant’s consent to search the car, even on a mere hunch.
- State of Louisiana v. Montreal Davis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
-
State v. Overstreet
263 So. 3d 1241
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/14/04), ; State v. Raheem , (La.
-
State v. Williams
112 So. 3d 1022
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Strange, 04-0273 (La.5/14/04), .
-
State ex rel. C.S.
106 So. 3d 93
La. 2012
State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 5 (La.5/14/04), (the relevant question under the Fourth Amendment is not that the police “ ‘always be right, but that they always be reasonable’ ”) (quoting Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 185 , 110 S.Ct.
-
State v. Lara
78 So. 3d 159
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Strange, 2004-0273 (La.05/14/04), .
-
State v. McElveen
73 So. 3d 1033
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 6 (La.5/14/04), .
-
State v. Jason
53 So. 3d 508
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 6 (La.5/14/04), .
- State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen Snelling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
State v. Snelling
36 So. 3d 1060
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.5/14/04), .
-
State v. Cooper
2 So. 3d 1172
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273 (La.5/14/04), ; cert.
-
State v. Sera
997 So. 2d 707
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See State v. Strange, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/04), ; State v. Cowan, 1999-2888 (La.6/16/00), ; State v. Pena, supra .
- State v. Loza 973 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
-
State v. Cox
963 So. 2d 1080
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
32:327(C) because of a flashing light from the rearview mirror, later held not to be a traffic violation (the stop was held objectively reasonable, but the evidence was suppressed on other grounds); • State v. Strange, 2004-0273 (La.5/14/04), —Another stop by an LSP trooper was upheld, even though the stop was predicated on the mistaken belief that this Texas driver was violating the law by driving in Louisiana with both temporary and permanent plates, which is entirely legal under Texas law; •
-
State v. Triplet
962 So. 2d 506
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.05/14/04), ; State v. Williams, 38,379 (La.App.2d Cir.11/25/03), , writ denied, 03-3535 (La.03/12/04), , on subsequent appeal, 39,660 (La.App.2d Cir.04/06/05), ; State v. Crews, 28,153 (La.
-
State v. Gomez
947 So. 2d 81
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.5/14/04), .
-
State v. CHATTERSON
942 So. 2d 646
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273 (La.05/14/04), ; cert.
- State of Louisiana v. Sean A. Strange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State v. Strange
940 So. 2d 819
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
See State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.5/14/04); .
-
State v. Johnson
926 So. 2d 781
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273 (La.05/14/04), ; cert.
-
State v. Preston
880 So. 2d 64
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
See, State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.5/14/04), .