Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Strange, 876 So. 2d 39.

21 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. Raymond L. Hart La. 2025
    5/14/04), following a legal initial traffic stop, there is nothing that precludes an officer from engaging the defendant in conversation and asking for defendant’s consent to search the car, even on a mere hunch.
  • State of Louisiana v. Montreal Davis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
  • State v. Overstreet 263 So. 3d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    5/14/04), ; State v. Raheem , (La.
  • State v. Williams 112 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Strange, 04-0273 (La.5/14/04), .
  • State ex rel. C.S. 106 So. 3d 93 La. 2012
    State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 5 (La.5/14/04), (the relevant question under the Fourth Amendment is not that the police “ ‘always be right, but that they always be reasonable’ ”) (quoting Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177, 185 , 110 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lara 78 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Strange, 2004-0273 (La.05/14/04), .
  • State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 6 (La.5/14/04), .
  • State v. Jason 53 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273, p. 6 (La.5/14/04), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen Snelling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Snelling 36 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.5/14/04), .
  • State v. Cooper 2 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273 (La.5/14/04), ; cert.
  • State v. Sera 997 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    See State v. Strange, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/14/04), ; State v. Cowan, 1999-2888 (La.6/16/00), ; State v. Pena, supra .
  • State v. Loza 973 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • State v. Cox 963 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    32:327(C) because of a flashing light from the rearview mirror, later held not to be a traffic violation (the stop was held objectively reasonable, but the evidence was suppressed on other grounds); • State v. Strange, 2004-0273 (La.5/14/04), —Another stop by an LSP trooper was upheld, even though the stop was predicated on the mistaken belief that this Texas driver was violating the law by driving in Louisiana with both temporary and permanent plates, which is entirely legal under Texas law; •
  • State v. Triplet 962 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.05/14/04), ; State v. Williams, 38,379 (La.App.2d Cir.11/25/03), , writ denied, 03-3535 (La.03/12/04), , on subsequent appeal, 39,660 (La.App.2d Cir.04/06/05), ; State v. Crews, 28,153 (La.
  • State v. Gomez 947 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.5/14/04), .
  • State v. CHATTERSON 942 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273 (La.05/14/04), ; cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Sean A. Strange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Strange 940 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    See State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.5/14/04); .
  • State v. Johnson 926 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Strange, 04-0273 (La.05/14/04), ; cert.
  • State v. Preston 880 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    See, State v. Strange, 04-273 (La.5/14/04), .