Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Basco v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 909 So. 2d 660.
-
Rentrop v. Arch Ins. Co.
241 So. 3d 357
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 3 Cir. 8/17/05), , 668-69, which states that in meeting the burden of proof on the issue of future medical expenses, "the plaintiff must show that, more probably than not, these expenses will be incurred and must present *371 medical testimony that they are indicated and the probable cost of these expenses."
- Sonja Dauzat Deligans, Et Ux. v. Ace American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- Deligans v. Ace American Insurance 86 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
-
Cece Sloan v. Renee Mouton
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 8/17/05), we reversed the jury’s rejection of an award for future loss of enjoyment of life and awarded the plaintiff $40,000.00 where decreased 10 range of motion and weakness in his left arm and hand resulted in a permanent impairment of ten to fifteen percent and curtailed the
-
Sloan v. Mouton
82 So. 3d 364
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 8/17/05) , , we reversed the jury’s rejection of an award for future loss of enjoyment of life and awarded the plaintiff $40,000.00 where decreased |nrange of motion and weakness in his left arm and hand resulted in a permanent impairment of ten to fifteen percent and curtailed the plaintiffs hunting and fishing activities and p
- Alisa Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Simon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 43 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- James Lastrapes, Et Ux. v. Progressive Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Lastrapes v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 24 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Garnet Thibodeaux v. Elizabeth Williamson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Thibodeaux v. Williamson 9 So. 3d 1075 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Colleen Wood v. American National Property & Casualty Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 8/17/05), Cormier v. Colston, 05-507 (La.App.
-
Wood v. American National Property & Casualty Ins. Co.
1 So. 3d 764
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 3 Cir. 8/17/05), ; Cormier v. Colston, 05-507 (La.App.
-
Byron P. Guillory v. Jennifer D. Lee
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 8/17/05), (awarded $44,000.00 for past and future loss of enjoyment of life); Thibodeaux v. Bernard, 00-72 (La.App.
-
Guillory v. Lee
998 So. 2d 891
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 8/17/05) , (awarded $44,000.00 for past and future loss of enjoyment of life); Thibodeaux v. Bernard, 00-72 (La.App.
-
Porter v. MONROE HOUSING AUTHORITY
986 So. 2d 852
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 8/17/05), , and the other cases cited in brief.
- Angelo Goutro v. F. G. Sullivan, Jr., Contractor, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Goutro v. Sullivan 986 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- Kourtney Phillips v. Cecilia Osmun La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Phillips v. Osmun 967 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- Strother v. Continental Cas. Ins. Co. 944 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Blaine Strother v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- McGee v. AC AND S, INC. 933 So. 2d 770 La. 2006
-
Phyllis Green v. Edwin Spriggs
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 8/17/05), we noted that damages for loss of enjoyment of life are recoverable upon proof that a plaintiff’s lifestyle has been detrimentally altered or that she was forced to give up activities as a result of her injury.
-
Green v. Spriggs
930 So. 2d 1052
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 8/17/05) , , we noted that damages for loss of enjoyment of life are recoverable upon proof that a plaintiffs lifestyle has been detrimentally altered or that she was forced to give up activities as a result of her injury.
- Joseph Lionel Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Melancon v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 926 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
Fox v. Anderson
924 So. 2d 399
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 8/17/05), (citations omitted), wherein a panel of this court stated: [I]n reviewing an award of general damages, the role of an appellate court is to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact.
-
Ronald Fox v. Jesse A. Anderson and Town of Krotz Springs
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 8/17/05), (citations omitted), wherein a panel of this court stated: [I]n reviewing an award of general damages, the role of an appellate court is to review the exercise of discretion by the trier of fact .
- Wanda Baker Smith v. the Municipality of Ferriday La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Smith v. Municipality of Ferriday 922 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Mary E. Cormier v. Robert Colston and Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Cormier v. Colston 918 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005