Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Siverd v. Permanent General Ins. Co., 922 So. 2d 497.

31 citing documents.

Susana F. Moody v. Ross Moody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Alisa Alan Durkheimer v. Tranise L. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Co., 05-0973, p. 3 (La.2/22/06)
Nicol Edward Hannie v. Colonial Oaks Al Lafayette Employer, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Robert Bell and Cheryl Bell Versus Danny Hembree, Stillwater Solutions, LLC, Allstate Insurance Company, and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
2/22/06), Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882-83.
Martin Baack and Brenda Baack v. Michael McIntosh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
United States Aircraft Insurance Group v. Global Tower, LLC D/B/A Global Tower Partners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Jody Stelly v. Joseph Roderick Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Gerald Janise v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Co., 05– 0973, p. 3 (La.2/22/06)
Janise v. Acadian Ambulance Serv., Inc. 244 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Partain v. Peaker 91 So. 3d 1160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
| ^Discussion In Siverd v. Permanent General Insurance Company, 2005-0973 (La.2/22/06), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the following concerning the review of fact: A court of appeal should not set aside the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.
Kathy A. Darbonne, Et Ux. v. Bertrand Investments, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Co., 05- 0973, p. 3 (La.2/22/06)
Lee J. Monlezun, M.D. v. Lyon Interests, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Monlezun v. Lyon Interests, Inc. 76 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 05-978 (La.2/22/06), .
Delisa Mitchell, Indiv. v. Albert Roy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/22/06), -500 (citations omitted), set out the standard of review applicable to this matter: A court of appeal should not set aside the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.
Mitchell v. Roy 51 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
DISCUSSION The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Siverd v. Permanent General Insurance Co., 05-973, p. 3 (La.2/22/06), -500 (citations omitted), set out the standard of review applicable to this matter: A court of appeal should not set aside the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.
Virginia Peoples, Et Ux. v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/22/06), -500: A court of appeal should not set aside the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.
Peoples v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. 38 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
DISCUSSION The standard of review applicable to this matter was set out by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Siverd v. Permanent General Insurance Co., 05-973, pp. 3-4 (La.2/22/06), , 499-500: A court of appeal should not set aside the factual findings of a trial court absent manifest error or unless clearly wrong.
Fields v. WALPOLE TIRE SERVICE, LLC 37 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.2/22/06), .
Fields v. Walpole Tire Service, L.L.C. 37 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Co., 2005-0973 (La.2/22/06), .
Scott v. American Tobacco Co., Inc. 36 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 05-0973, p. 3 (La.2/22/06), ().
Peter Norman Broussard, Jr. v. Theta Charles Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Broussard v. Compton 36 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., 05-973, pp. 3-4 (La.2/22/06), -500 .
Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 23 So. 3d 259 La. 2009
Co., 05-0973, p. 3 (La.2/22/06), .
Lynette M. Martin v. Ermc, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2/22/06), writ denied, 05-0967 (La.
Martin v. ERMC, II 23 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., 05-973 (La.2/22/06), , unit denied, 05-0967 (La.4/24/06), .
Radcliffe 10, LLC v. Zip Tube Systems 998 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Co., 05-0973 (La.2/22/06), .
Elliott v. Normand 976 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Co., 05-0973 (La.2/22/06), , writ denied as moot, 05-0967 (La.4/24/06), (citation omitted).
John Mathews v. Black Tie, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Mathews v. Black Tie, L.L.C. 957 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Co., 05-973 (La.2/22/06), .
Finley v. "ABC" Insurance Co. 946 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Co., 2005-0973 (La.2/22/06), .
Thomas v. AP Green Industries, Inc. 933 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Co., XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.2/22/06), (noting that "[w]here two permissible views of the evidence exist, the fact-finder's choice between them cannot be manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.") Applying these principles to the facts of this case, the plaintiffs assert both vicarious liability claims arising out of Mr. Joshua's work activity with McCa