Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moss v. State, 925 So. 2d 1185.

57 citing documents.

Dpmlgsprla, LLC Versus Doctor's Advantage, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
4/4/06), a case in which the Supreme Court determined that La.
Jennifer Arcuri Versus Walter Stevens, Jr., Eliana Defrancesch, in Her Capacity as Clerk of Court for St. John … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Amy Wederstrandt And Billy R. Efferson, Jr. v. Eden Kol La. 2023
2d 15, 19; Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06)
Carlo Carollo, Jr., And Frank Carollo, Individually La. 2022
Francis Deal v. Adrian Perkins And Caddo Parish Clerk Of Court, Mike Spence, In His Official Capacity La. 2022
Santos Rodas Versus Albert Nutter, Crescent Crown Distributinc, L.L.C. and Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Emilio Taylor La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Kanisha M. Baker La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Clerk of Court For the Court Gary C. Bertrand And Melissa P. Bertrand v. Glenn J. Patrick; Aig … La. 2020
Clerk of Court For the Court Gary C. Bertrand And Melissa P. Bertrand v. Glenn J. Patrick; Aig … La. 2020
Earnest Dean Bryant Individually And On Behalf Of Opal Bryant v. Naomi Heights Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, Llc La. 2020
La. 2020
Winmill Tire, LLC v. Colt, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Colvin v. Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Bd., 06-1104, p. 6 (La.1/17/07), Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06)
State in the Interest of G. J. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Thus, our courts must “give effect to all parts of a statute and to construe no sentence, clause or word as meaningless.” Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06)
Kevin E. Bias v. Louisiana Physical Therapy Board La. 2019
Thus, our courts must “give effect to all parts of a statute and construe no sentence, clause or word as meaningless.” Moss v. State, 05-1963 (La.4/4/06)
In re Youngblood 245 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Philip Shelton v. Nancy Pavon 236 So. 3d 1233 La. 2017
Danielle Larson v. Xyz Insurance Company 226 So. 3d 412 La. 2017
4/4/06), see also, Connecticut Nat.
Bass v. State 167 So. 3d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Moss v. State, 2005-1963 (La.4/4/06), .
New Iberia Firefighters Assoc.,local 755 v. City of New Iberia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
New Iberia Firefighters Ass'n, Local 775 v. City of New Iberia 140 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Louisiana Revised Statutes 1:9 provides: Unless it is otherwise clearly indicated by the context, whenever the term “or” is used in the Revised Statutes, it is used in the disjunctive and does not mean “and/or.” Moss v. State, 05-1963, pp. 15-16 (La.4/4/06), -97 .
Weston P. Miller v. Cathy Broussard Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Miller v. Miller 161 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Moss v. State, 05-1963 (La.4/4/06), .
Brady Gotte v. Barnes Personnel Management, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
“As a general rule, parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action.” Moss v. State of Louisiana through D.O.T.D., 05-1963, p. 6 (La.4/4/06)
Gotte v. Barnes Personnel Management, Inc. 133 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“As a general rule, parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action.” Moss v. State of Louisiana through D.O.T.D., 05-1963, p. 6 (La.4/4/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Robyn B. Little Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Rhymes v. Rhymes 125 So. 3d 377 La. 2013
Colvin v. Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Bd., 06-1104, p. 6 (La.1/17/07), ; Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
State v. Nellon 124 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“A statute must be applied and interpreted in a manner that is logical and consistent with the presumed purpose and intent of the legislature.” Moss v. State, 2005-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Anton Chehardy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4/4/06), and the trial court cited Prine v. Bailey, 42,282, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Chehardy 157 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
During arguments, Defendant cited Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 6 (La.4/4/06), , and the trial court cited Prine v. Bailey, 42,282, p. 9 (La.App.
West Monroe Firefighters Local 1385 v. City of West Monroe 111 So. 3d 330 La. 2013
Thus, our courts must “give effect to all parts of a statute and construe no sentence, clause or word as meaningless.” Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
Boudreaux v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections 101 So. 3d 22 La. 2012
Colvin v. Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Bd., 06-1104, p. 6 (La.1/17/07), ; Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
Katie Realty, Ltd. v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 100 So. 3d 324 La. 2012
Colvin v. Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Bd., 06-1104, p. 6 (La.1/17/07), ; Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
Louisiana Environmental Action Network v. Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality 97 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Colvin v. Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Bd., 06-1104 (La.1/17/07), ; Moss v. State, 05-1963 (La.4/4/06), .
Powell v. J & R Enterprises-Shreveport, LLC 91 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
McGlothlin, supra, citing Colvin v. Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Bd., 06-1104 (La.1/17/07), , and Moss v. State, 05-1963 (La.4/4/06), .
Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 79 So. 3d 987 La. 2011
Colvin v. Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Bd., 06-1104, p. 6 (La.1/17/07), ; Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital 65 So. 3d 1218 La. 2011
Colvin v. Louisiana Patient’s Compensation Fund Oversight Bd., 06-1104, p. 6 (La.1/17/07), ; Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
State ex rel. of I.P. 53 So. 3d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Legislative intent is determined “by considering the law in its entirety and all other laws on the same subject matter and by placing a construction on the law that is consistent with the express terms of the law and with the obvious intent of the legislature in enacting the law.” Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
Manuel Lumpkin v. A.B.E.L. Trucking of Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
4/4/06), (citations and footnote omitted).
Lumpkin v. A.B.E.L. Trucking of Louisiana LLC. 40 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Moss v. State, 05-1968, pp. 15-16 (La.4/4/06), (citations and footnote omitted).
State v. 2003 Infiniti G35 VIN JNKCV51E93MO24167 27 So. 3d 824 La. 2010
n the wording of a Section is clear and free of ambiguity, the letter of it shall not be disregarded under the pretext of pursing its spirit.” We are likewise cognizant of the principles for statutory interpretation found in the jurisprudence, particularly that “[t]he fundamental question in all cases of statutory interpretation is legislative intent.” Moss v. State, 2006-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
Erdey v. Progressive Security Insurance Co. 31 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1:3 and Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 16 (La.4/4/06), .
Black v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital 25 So. 3d 711 La. 2009
Colvin , 06-1104 at p. 6, 947 So.2d at 19 ; Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
Dianna Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Broussard v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 998 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), .
Wade Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Phillips v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Moss v. State, 05-1963, pp. 15-16 (La.4/4/06), .
In re Medical Review Panel Proceedings of Brown 992 So. 2d 969 La. 2008
See Moss v. State, 05-1963 (La.4/04/06), .
In Re Medical Review Panel Proceedings of Brown 992 So. 2d 969 La. 2008
See Moss v. State, 05-1963 (La.4/04/06), .
Moss v. State 993 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See Moss v. State, 05-1963 (La.4/4/06), .