DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pigford, 922 So. 2d 517.

734 citing documents.

  • State v. Nealon 179 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Johnson 175 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.02/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.
  • State v. Sanderson 174 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State v. Howard 169 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.
  • State v. Randle 166 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.
  • State v. Chatman 167 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.
  • State v. Dock 167 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), .
  • State v. Demery 165 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Jones 166 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.02/22/06), .
  • State v. Robinson 166 So. 3d 395 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.02/22/06), .
  • State v. Smith 166 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Stephens 165 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Crossley, supra.
  • State v. Baker 166 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jared Paul Pontiff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    It does not allow the appellate court ―to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.‖ State v. Pigford, 05–477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96–1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarlon Pierre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Pontiff 166 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; ).
  • State v. Pierre 170 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    art. 821 and “does not provide the appellate court with a vehicle to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), .
  • State v. Mitchell 163 So. 3d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Beene 164 So. 3d 299 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), .
  • State v. Robinson 163 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.02/22/06), .
  • State v. Martin 163 So. 3d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), .
  • State v. Manning 164 So. 3d 346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.l 1/6/09), .
  • State v. Thompson 163 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Brian Lowell Frazier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.
  • State v. Frazier 157 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that |7of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), 680 Sb.2d 1165; ).
  • State v. Murray 161 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Bratton 161 So. 3d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Rexford 161 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.02/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.01/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/06/09), .
  • State v. Lewis 161 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Chaddrick D. Mayes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Mayes 154 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 6/4/14), (quoting State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), ).
  • State v. Jones 152 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.02/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.01/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.11/06/09), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Troy Edward Delozier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    2/22/06), 521 (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.
  • State v. Delozier 151 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Quint Mire La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048, p. 1 (La.
  • State v. Mire 149 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    This standard does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048, p. 1 (La.10/4/96), ; ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Carl J. Webb, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State v. Morning 149 So. 3d 925 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Webb 149 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; ).
  • State v. Broussard 149 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Crossley, supra; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.
  • State v. Baker 148 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.
  • State v. Passaniti 144 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.02/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.01/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/06/09), .
  • State v. Byrd 145 So. 3d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Walter 144 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State v. Ellis 144 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Crossley, supra; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/14/09), 1 So.3d'833, writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ted Dwayne Stevens, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tony Jackson, AKA Leoanrdo Jackson, AKA Leon Jackson, AKA Leonardo Marice Jackson, AKA Leonard … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Jackson 146 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), .
  • State v. Stevens 140 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    It does not | fiallow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Daniel Joseph Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.