DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pigford, 922 So. 2d 517.

734 citing documents.

  • State v. Saltzman 128 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Dee Gildhouse La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Gildhouse 123 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    art. 821 and does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), .
  • State v. Humphries 124 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Lewis 125 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State v. York 121 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), .
  • State v. Davis 121 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Johnson 121 So. 3d 1251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Bill Eric Winters La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State v. Winters 118 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    In applying the Jackson standard, the reviewing court cannot “substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), .
  • State v. Rochelle 118 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State v. Crossley 117 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.
  • State v. Housley 117 So. 3d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.
  • State v. Singleton 117 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Thomas Kirk Gaton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    fact-finder.‖ State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Kelvin Moses La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Aaron Francois La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.
  • State v. Francois 114 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; ).
  • State v. Stephens 114 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Smith 114 So. 3d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State v. George 115 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.02/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App Cir.01/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.11/06/09), .
  • State v. Smith 116 So. 3d 884 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), .
  • State v. Humphreys 114 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State v. Bailey 115 So. 3d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Gage 113 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Jackson 112 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 113 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. James R Francis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ernest Joseph Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State v. Francis 111 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ; ).
  • State v. Arceneaux 111 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State v. Thornton 111 So. 3d 1130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Goosby 111 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Willis J. Mouton AKA Willis James Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State v. Mouton 129 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court “to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.” State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State v. Carey 110 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), *231 ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State v. McGarr 110 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 110 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Stanley Charles Young, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court ―to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.‖ State v. Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. James Lee Burks, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    It does not allow the appellate court ―to substitute its own appreciation of the evidence for that of the fact-finder.‖ State v. 13 Pigford, 05-477, p. 6 (La.2/22/06), State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.10/4/96)
  • State v. Grady 108 So. 3d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.02/22/06), .
  • State v. Womack 109 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 09-0310 (La.11/06/09), .
  • State v. Blackson 108 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.02/22/06), .
  • State v. Johnson 109 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Mason 109 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.11/6/09), .
  • State v. Brooks 108 So. 3d 161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir. 1/14/09), , writ denied, 2009-0310 (La.
  • State v. Robinson 106 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Pigford, 2005-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.
  • State v. Williams 107 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Pigford, 05-0477 (La.2/22/06), ; State v. Dotie, 43,819 (La.App.2d Cir.1/14/09), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Dexter Holder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jeremiah R. Teno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    2/22/06), (citing State v. Robertson, 96-1048 (La.