Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hughes, 943 So. 2d 1047.

158 citing documents.

State v. White 228 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/29/06), ; State v. Davis, 01-3033 (La.
State v. Grimble 224 So. 3d 498 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
11/29/06), ; State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.
State v. Golden 223 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/29/06), ; State v. Davis, 2001-3033 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel McCoy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
11/29/06), held: [W]hen the key issue is the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator, rather than whether the crime was committed, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.
State v. McCoy 219 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/29/06), , held: [W]hen the key issue is the defendant’s identity as the perpetrator, rather than whether the crime was committed, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.
State v. Harvey 222 So. 3d 67 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
11/29/06), ; State v. Neal, 2000-0674 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Marlon Frank Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
11/29/06), (citations omitted).
State v. Thomas 217 So. 3d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/29/06), (citations omitted).
State v. Green 211 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
11/29/06), ; State v. Davis, 01-3033 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Tedrick Jewan Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
11/29/06), The commitment order presently provides that: ―Defendant is given 60 years without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.‖ 4 1051.
State v. Richardson 210 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Ward 209 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
11/29/06), ; State v. Jefferson, 47,009 (La.App.
State v. White 206 So. 3d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
11/29/06), , 1051 and State v. Davis, 2001-3033 (La.App.
State v. Robinson 197 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Hughes, 2005-0992 (La.11/29/06), ; State v. Clark, 50,137 (La.App.2d Cir.9/30/15), .
State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
See State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
State v. Freeman 194 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), ; State v. Powell, 27,959 (La.
State v. Jackson 189 So. 3d 1150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Hughes, 2005-0992 (La.11/29/06), ; State v. Richie, 44,783 (La.App.
State v. Jones 188 So. 3d 268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Hughes, 2005-0992 (La.11/29/06), ; Powell, supra.
State v. Pratt 184 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Hughes, 2005-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Nealon 179 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Clark 181 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Little 174 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Glyndale Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Arceneaux 164 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Hughes, 05-992, p. 5 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Charles 171 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Martin 163 So. 3d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
11/29/06), , (citing State v. Weary, 2003-3067 (La.4/24/06), , and State v. Neal, 2000-0674 (La.6/29/01), ).
State v. Casaday 162 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
In State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), , the supreme court observed that an accomplice is qualified to testify against a coperpetrator even if the state offers him inducements to testify; the inducements merely affect the witness’s credibility.
State v. Sims 162 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Hughes, 2005-0992 (La.11/29/06), ; State v. Jefferson, 47,009 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Troy Edward Delozier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Delozier 151 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Additionally, where the key issue is not whether the crime occurred but whether the defendant is the perpetrator, the State is “required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification.” State v. Hughes, 05-992, p. 5 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. George 142 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See, State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Price 140 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Percy 137 So. 3d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), , citing State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), , and State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.16/29/01),6 .
State in the Interest of E. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Hughes, 05-992, pp. 5-6 (La.11/29/06)
State ex rel. E.T. 136 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hughes, 05-0992, pp. 5-6 (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Isiah Demon Lively La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
11/29/06), (citing State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.
State v. Lively 153 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Hughes, 05-992, p. 5 (La.11/29/06), (citing State v. Weary, 03-3067 (La.4/24/06), , cert.
State v. Khanh Le 131 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Dussett 126 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hughes, 2005-0992, pp. 5-6 (La.11/29/06), (citing State v. Weary, 2003-3067 (La.4/24/06), ; State v. Neal, 00-0674 (La.6/29/01), ).
State of Louisiana v. Eric John Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Anderson 116 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Hughes, 05-992, pp. 5-6 (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Bryant Lakeith Bethley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Bryant Lakeith Bethley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Bethley 107 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 10/7/09), ; State v. Hughes, 05-992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Bethley 107 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Since Defendant challenges his identity as the perpetrator, the State was “required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentiflcation.” George, 19 So.3d at 618 ; State v. Hughes, 05-992, p. 5 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Womack 109 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Williams 107 So. 3d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Lilly 111 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hughes, 05-0992 (La.11/29/06), .